First off, I'm one who believes there are no bad cards, but there are some times that a reading is pretty obviously off. In that case, I'm not convinced it's always a good idea to soften the impact -- at all. In my readings for myself, I tend to be in denial when something difficult is coming up, even if it's fairly obvious in the cards, and only later do I tend to realize in just how bad a light I should have seen it -- and I'm not all that much of an optimist, believe me. But if another reader were to tell me, "oh that's nothing to worry about" I'd want to believe them, when in fact perhaps I needed validation of a troubling situation and needed to bolster myself, or at least be on my guard and get some help figuring out how to deal with it.
I think the impact does need to be handled with caution if the sitter is particularly superstitious or clearly already distraught and incapable of handling their life at the moment. But then I have to wonder why would they go to a Tarot reader instead of . . . doctor, lawyer, therapist, etc? Are they also in denial and do they need a firm nudge into professional help?
Maybe a good opener would be, "Well that doesn't look very good, does it?" And see how the sitter responds. Whatever the card is about may already be at work in their lives or they may already be having odd feelings about it, and perhaps they just need some validation and guidance from the cards as to how best to handle the situation. Making everything look too cheerful might make them internalize or be reluctant to get at what they really need out of the reading.
I also wonder, if a reader softens the impact of a reading, is the reader protecting the querent, or herself? Doctors don't like to deliver bad news either. But if it's one's job . . .
I have at times said, "Well, my first impression when I saw that card was . . ." and state the worst thing that popped into my mind -- in as diplomatic and gentle a way as possible. Then said, "But that's not always what this card is about, of course." I think if there is something awful in their lives at the moment they'll be quick to say so. Then we could go on from there. I remember one person, asking about a date, said she did have funny feelings after I mentioned my misgivings about the card that came up, and then we went into some of the ways she could ensure her safety going out with this new person. If I'd been too quick to soften the card's impact, I might not have been doing my job responsibly. (It wasn't a paid reading, mind you, but I consider every reading I do for another a responsibility.)
The times that I haven't come out and said what bothered me, I regretted it, and kept wondering afterwards if I should've said more about what bugged me in the reading. Would that have been more helpful? These days I tend to think so, that the more said about negative aspects the better.
Splungeman said:
Part of the excitement of getting a reading is the fear of a "bad" card.
I disagree that this is usually the case. I think people go to readers wanting to know what good will come, even if they're troubled. Maybe especially if they're troubled.
Nevada