Le Fanu
I'm curious, as I find myself getting fascinated by yet another deck. I'm curious as to what you think the largest number of decks is that one can read well with.
Now first of all I know that many readers (most readers?) read well with one deck, and one deck only, for many years. I'm not including those here.
I also know that most of us can read reasonably well with any deck.
It's not that issue I'm curious about.
However, I find that I like to rotate a number of decks and I keep coming back to the same decks again and again. I have between 10 and 15 frequent reading decks which I believe I read my best with. Of course the really, really best decks for me number about 3 (Thoth, Victorian Romantic & Navigators of the Mystic SEA), but such is my attraction to the artwork or the system that I reach out for others.
I also suspect that the fewer decks you know well, the better you will read with them. Or is that a false assumption?
I can read with any deck really, but if someone asks me for a reading, of course I am going to choose a deck which I think I read well with so I can give my best. And I begin to wonder whether reading well (by my definition!) with 15 decks is actually rather or lot. Or maybe very few? What number would you give?
In your opinion, what's a reasonable number of decks to be able to read WELL with, without spreading oneself too thinly?
Now first of all I know that many readers (most readers?) read well with one deck, and one deck only, for many years. I'm not including those here.
I also know that most of us can read reasonably well with any deck.
It's not that issue I'm curious about.
However, I find that I like to rotate a number of decks and I keep coming back to the same decks again and again. I have between 10 and 15 frequent reading decks which I believe I read my best with. Of course the really, really best decks for me number about 3 (Thoth, Victorian Romantic & Navigators of the Mystic SEA), but such is my attraction to the artwork or the system that I reach out for others.
I also suspect that the fewer decks you know well, the better you will read with them. Or is that a false assumption?
I can read with any deck really, but if someone asks me for a reading, of course I am going to choose a deck which I think I read well with so I can give my best. And I begin to wonder whether reading well (by my definition!) with 15 decks is actually rather or lot. Or maybe very few? What number would you give?
In your opinion, what's a reasonable number of decks to be able to read WELL with, without spreading oneself too thinly?