noby
Lately, I've been curious about astrology. I just bought a datebook that lists the sign the moon is in for each day, and I've been interested in working with this information to see how it may or may not appear to affect my life.
The idea that the location of the sun, the moon, and the planets has an affect on us makes sense to me. We are all part of larger systems, and it seems to me that it is simply common sense that the movements of these systems of which we are a part affect us.
However, I keep getting stuck on the specific signs of "Western" astrology - how is it we can frame these effects in terms of qualities of a sign based on an arbitrary pattern given to the stars, such as that of a "water bearer," for example? How do we know that when the sun or moon or something else is in the Aquarius position, for example, that the effects on us can be described in terms of a symbolic image arbitrarily pasted upon the stars long ago? What if the founders of Western astrology had looked in the "Aquarius region" and seen a dragon instead, for example?
My skepticism is greeted by the fact that so many of the people I have encountered indeed display the qualities associated with their sign. So I wonder, when we see the effects of a certain sign, are we merely looking for confirmation and projecting, or is there really something to the signs? If so, what went into choosing the signs, naming them, and attributing qualities to them? Is there an astrological history site that puts this in a good perspective?
The idea that the location of the sun, the moon, and the planets has an affect on us makes sense to me. We are all part of larger systems, and it seems to me that it is simply common sense that the movements of these systems of which we are a part affect us.
However, I keep getting stuck on the specific signs of "Western" astrology - how is it we can frame these effects in terms of qualities of a sign based on an arbitrary pattern given to the stars, such as that of a "water bearer," for example? How do we know that when the sun or moon or something else is in the Aquarius position, for example, that the effects on us can be described in terms of a symbolic image arbitrarily pasted upon the stars long ago? What if the founders of Western astrology had looked in the "Aquarius region" and seen a dragon instead, for example?
My skepticism is greeted by the fact that so many of the people I have encountered indeed display the qualities associated with their sign. So I wonder, when we see the effects of a certain sign, are we merely looking for confirmation and projecting, or is there really something to the signs? If so, what went into choosing the signs, naming them, and attributing qualities to them? Is there an astrological history site that puts this in a good perspective?