"I have to say that reading the tarot is no great mystery--anybody can learn. It's not a secret society, or a lodge with limited membership or even a mystery religion. It's a skill. It is also perhaps a talent that one can develop. As is psychicism."
As long as people don't know, it's a mystery. If I go with your logic, then "nothing" is a mystery and I would agree. But that's not what I'm talking about.
Just to let others know what I mean when I say:
Mystery:
"The skills, lore, or practices that are peculiar to a particular activity or group and are regarded as the special province of initiates."
Initiate: "One who has been introduced to or has attained knowledge in a particular field."
source:
http://www.dictionary.com
"I explain what I'm doing as I go along, because it is no great mystery. I
want my clients to understand what I'm doing."
If they didn't know how it worked before you start explaining, then to me -- they would think it mysterious. And isn't it enough for seekers to just get their questions answered? I'm confused about the "teaching during a reading" part.
"I am being paid for my time, knowledge and skill,"
are you also being paid to share trade "secrets" or the telling of process?
If you want to, it's obviously your right but I'm curious.
"and I do not feel that the "industry" will be harmed or destroyed if I point out how 2 cards work together."
2 cards? Oh, probably not 2 cards but I don't see it working that way. An industry gets harmed over time through many people, acts, situations, experiences, etc... I don't think one or two people affect the whole. I see the whole affecting the whole.
Lets look at phone readings. Someone who has got quick readings by phone (because it can get very expensive) may have a hard time working with a traditional in-person reading.
I'm of the belief that frames of reference and value of skill change when someone knows what you are doing. At the same time, I am somewhat happy that more people are getting involved in Tarot as it makes what we do "legitimate" and takes away from the "scary" or "otherworldly" aspect: Everyone can do it!! Then again, I don't just do Tarot -- if I did I would be very worried in regards to the future and the work I do.
"I want to be more than a mysterious sybil to my clients. I'd rather be a role model of what application and practice can accomplish."
I hope I'm not being misunderstood. I do not believe that my clients should look at me in any which way other than a person who has skill, knowledge, and interest to answer their questions for their highest good and happiness using esoteric tools.
This is the part I don't get: role model of application and practice -- why do your clients need to know how you do what you do? How does that make one a role model? That's where I see the "teaching" element really strong when I see others share exactly what it is that they are doing. I don't see any "wrong" in that, it's just that I don't fully understand it and believe it can have a detriment on the industry.
When I say: no mystery = no money that is quite accurate in a broad sense; however, I'm not using the word "mystery" as in "no one can ever learn about what is behind that veil". I believe everyone, with enough time and interest can learn whatever it is that they want to.
Otherwise, I would have never learned all that I have on my own. Before Tarot was a mystery and it is no longer. Astrology is still somewhat of a mystery as I haven't fully explored it and likely never will.
"But then, I've been doing this for a very long time, and am not threatened by the possibility of others gaining knowledge and insight with tarot."
I have been doing this for a long time too.
I'm not "personally" threatened. I'm addressing something a lot of professionals don't and that's looking at the whole picture. That's why a lot of professions have associations that protect the professionals & consumers, educate the public, and offer certifications.
I think a lot of readers are not looking at the whole which is one area I wanted to address in this thread. Personally I have enough confidence and diversification in divinatory practice and ability that it doesn't bother me (other than people expecting cheap readings or that I'm going to tell them what deck I'm using -- focus on the reading!!
but I'm somewhat concerned for the industry -- somewhat.
"I'm glad to see new readers--they will ensure that tarot will not die out after I'm gone."
Everyone is a reader these days! Tarot is very very accessible to the point where there could be a devaluing of skill. As illustrated before, if someone thinks they can do it -- it shouldn't cost as much, even if a) they don't know how to do it and b) they don't do it. It just seems to be a universal principle or something.
There is money in mystery.
"When I first started reading back in the early 1960's, there where very few readers and very few decks on the market. The tarot renascence in the middle '70's changed that, and tarot has been flourishing ever since. I'm in favor of that continuing."
I'm all for that continuing as well.
"These new readers are not all going to run right out and become competition for me."
I disagree.
"A few of them may, and so what? None of them will provide exactly what I do, just as I do not provide exactly what they do."
Well that's true. That's why I don't worry much about my personal ability to continue to make money in this industry but I'm not just looking at that.
"It's a big world with lots of room for us all."
ehhh... I'm not so sure about that. I mean why did Web designers start hangin the "will work for food" signs? Everyone became a Web designer overnight and Web design is really undervalued and oversaturated these days.
Yes, there are designers who still make a living doing what they do but there's a lot of competition. Same goes with graphic design. I mean, if one's nephew can whip up a site, why bother hiring someone to make a professional site for $1500.00 when Joey can do it for free!
Sure there is a case for doing it professionally but there are a ton of people who couldn't give a hoot, FREE speaks louder.
"Really."
Really