The biggest problem with Kasamba isn't that the customer who isn't satisfied won't pay just once and the readers aren't accepting the policy of 100% satisfaction. I've owned a couple of businesses and I'm with the rest of you who say it's better to work with the dissatisfied customer here and there. The problem is that there are people there who scam the readers to the tune of hundreds of dollars sometimes, getting reading after reading from the same reader but then refusing to pay. The reader doesn't know this has happened till it's too late and a bunch of readings have been given and then Kasamba turns a deaf ear. Then the scammer just changes ID's, comes back, and hits someone else, but in the meantime, the reader has been ripped off. There are some people who actually get addicted to having tarot readings done and those are probably the offenders.
I feel that, since this does happen and fairly frequently, it's not fair to the readers, (from whom Kasamba is taking about half their money and without whom Kasamba wouldn't be making their millions, mind you) for Kasamba to continue with that "100% satisfaction or you don't pay" policy. I don't feel that should be stated on the front page even if they want the readers to adhere to it. They could tell the readers to follow it, but not make it a huge loophole on the front page for clients to scam readers through without Kasamba providing at least some recourse. That's bad business on Kasamba's part, don't you think?
Now, the flip answer that I'm sure is in some of the minds who will be reading my post is the same as what they say about abused women------"well, you keep doing it so you must like it" or words to that effect. Think again. For some of us who are disabled, it's one of the few ways we can earn a little extra money to get by with and we keep doing it because we need the money, not because we like getting scammed and then ignored when we complain to Kasamba. I can read for the public here in my town, but in other towns, readers can't do that, as in danubhe's case.