Rosanne
I was reading a companion book and I came across this information that I had never heard of before. I thought I might share it and would welcome opinions.
The ancient world has produced many diverse mystical paths, spiritual disciplines, oracles and esoteric traditions.
I agree with that. It then goes on...
Four of these- astrology, kabbalah, alchemy and tarot- are thought to correspond to the four archetypal elements. Thus the very logical and linear science of astrology is representative of the rational world of air signs. Kaballah is the path of earth, one of its essential principles being the movement between heaven and earth on the tree of life. Alchemy is governed by the element of fire, this ancient art being preoccupied with the creative process. This leaves the realm of water, the dream like images of the subconscious, and the Tarot, an oracle which speaks directly to our intuition
Apart from other ideas that this brings, I was wondering why there do not seem to be Tarot decks that do not show this clearly within the suits i.e Swords have astrological correspondances, Coins have Kabbalah, alchemy is with the Wands and Cups are always water thus the leading suit of Tarot. Not only is there differing opinions as to which suit is which element, why are there these differing philosophical systems incorporated into Tarot? Does this muddy the water? Does this make the images more prone to dogma? Does it make Tarot less flexible and less open to interpretation? Does it narrow the range of ideas rather than expand them? Are not the archetypes, the major theme less able to cross all social, cultural, racial and religious barriers if there are all of these philosophies contained with the 78 cards?
I hope I have made my queries lucid enough for discussion. ~Rosanne
The ancient world has produced many diverse mystical paths, spiritual disciplines, oracles and esoteric traditions.
I agree with that. It then goes on...
Four of these- astrology, kabbalah, alchemy and tarot- are thought to correspond to the four archetypal elements. Thus the very logical and linear science of astrology is representative of the rational world of air signs. Kaballah is the path of earth, one of its essential principles being the movement between heaven and earth on the tree of life. Alchemy is governed by the element of fire, this ancient art being preoccupied with the creative process. This leaves the realm of water, the dream like images of the subconscious, and the Tarot, an oracle which speaks directly to our intuition
Apart from other ideas that this brings, I was wondering why there do not seem to be Tarot decks that do not show this clearly within the suits i.e Swords have astrological correspondances, Coins have Kabbalah, alchemy is with the Wands and Cups are always water thus the leading suit of Tarot. Not only is there differing opinions as to which suit is which element, why are there these differing philosophical systems incorporated into Tarot? Does this muddy the water? Does this make the images more prone to dogma? Does it make Tarot less flexible and less open to interpretation? Does it narrow the range of ideas rather than expand them? Are not the archetypes, the major theme less able to cross all social, cultural, racial and religious barriers if there are all of these philosophies contained with the 78 cards?
I hope I have made my queries lucid enough for discussion. ~Rosanne