MareSaturni
I've been wondering this for a while now...
I see many people - and books - telling that one should read tarot without following crazily book meanings, because they are limiting. That we should read what we see, intuitively.
And i agree - if it took just a book and a set of cards to be a reader, nobody would need us. Heh. Everybody would be their own DIY tarot reader.
But i was also thinking...what if, following intuition too much, we end up subverting the tarot? We end up geting away from the 'basic' thing that makes tarot what it is, and not just an oracle deck.
I see many tarot decks that twist and turn and bend and stretch tarot so much i can no longer recognize them as a tarot decks anymore. For me, it's an oracle with trumps.
It's like the authors are re-inventing something based on tarot, but no longer connected to the tarot as we know it.
But then again...what if us, as reader, are doing a similar thing? What is we are using too much what we think and...re-inventing tarot. Giving it the meanings we think that fit better and everything, with no connection to the traditional meanings?
I'm not saying it's wrong - please i'm not being judgemental here. I just can't help but think that maybe we too twist and turn tarot meanings according to our intuition that in the end we drift away from what tarot it. Because if tarot can be anything the reader wants, then...what makes it 'tarot', and nothing something else created by the reader?
When does 'taromancy' become 'i-think-so-mancy'?
Did i make any sense?
Thanks for reading and, if possible, answering.
I see many people - and books - telling that one should read tarot without following crazily book meanings, because they are limiting. That we should read what we see, intuitively.
And i agree - if it took just a book and a set of cards to be a reader, nobody would need us. Heh. Everybody would be their own DIY tarot reader.
But i was also thinking...what if, following intuition too much, we end up subverting the tarot? We end up geting away from the 'basic' thing that makes tarot what it is, and not just an oracle deck.
I see many tarot decks that twist and turn and bend and stretch tarot so much i can no longer recognize them as a tarot decks anymore. For me, it's an oracle with trumps.
It's like the authors are re-inventing something based on tarot, but no longer connected to the tarot as we know it.
But then again...what if us, as reader, are doing a similar thing? What is we are using too much what we think and...re-inventing tarot. Giving it the meanings we think that fit better and everything, with no connection to the traditional meanings?
I'm not saying it's wrong - please i'm not being judgemental here. I just can't help but think that maybe we too twist and turn tarot meanings according to our intuition that in the end we drift away from what tarot it. Because if tarot can be anything the reader wants, then...what makes it 'tarot', and nothing something else created by the reader?
When does 'taromancy' become 'i-think-so-mancy'?
Did i make any sense?
Thanks for reading and, if possible, answering.