nisaba
...the ONLY deck I had with me ...
<to self> This was allegedly written by ... Gregory ...
<falls over in shock>
...the ONLY deck I had with me ...
There is another half, the third half...those of us who never bought it at all.
No matter how many times you say that it isn't the whole Greenwood marketing ploy (and it was the creaters who shot themselves in the foot on this one), people tend to think that - yes - again - people must be offended because of the Greenwood thing.Good point well made AJ, although I now think our maths doesn't quite add up!
However it has definitely been a well discussed deck, and of course there were the tarotistas's who felt the deck was disrespectful and not in good tatse to it's mother deck the Greenwood and Chesca Potter the artist and co-creator of the deck.
The Wildwood is the first deck I've ever owned. I ran across it on happenstance and hadn't heard of the Greenwood deck until afterward but I must say I'm eager to look into that one now, too. Although it's a bit difficult for me to parse out the meaning of some of the cards based on the descriptions in the book, I am thoroughly enjoying learning my way around the Wildwood deck. The few personal, very small readings I've done so far have been very poignant and surprisingly accurate. Not to mention the gorgeous artwork, as noted further up the page.
No matter how many times you say that it isn't the whole Greenwood marketing ploy (and it was the creaters who shot themselves in the foot on this one), people tend to think that - yes - again - people must be offended because of the Greenwood thing.
I think AJ was right not to buy it. I wish I hadn't but I suppose curiosity got the better of me, as it invariably does. Still, it seems to be doing well enough for itself...