Choosing your cards...
Thread originally posted on the Aeclectic Tarot Forum on 06 Sep 2001, and now archived in the Forum Library.
| Brynn |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
I have a modest collection of tarot cards about 10 decks in all... I picked them up for various reasons, color, symbolism etc. Anyway, I was wondering what are the major things that you look for when buying your decks? What colors influance you the most? Was it a feeling you got, or a visual factor?
Love and Light,
Brynn
|
| jade |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
visual. definitely. there has to be lots of colour and details/movement to each card so that it can talk alot. also, they have to speak to me when i first look at them or i don't buy them.
jade
|
| Kiama |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
It used to be visual for me. But now I have a collection of 20 decks, and I want some more unusual ones now, so it's not just visual for me now, although that helps. I like themed decks, which provide a whole new outlook on the Tarot.
Kiama
|
| nexyjo |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
i also have about 20 decks. i don't know that it's the color that draws me. i like a certain style of art, and i don't like other styles. i love the art noeveau decks, and the robin wood, and the legend: arthurian tarot, but i don't like the shapeshifter, or brian williams renaissance deck, or the celtic dragon. i don't like enough of the dragons so it ruins the deck for me. the dragon tarot is pretty, but there's no art on the minors if i remember correctly, so i can't say i like that deck either. i was going to say i like realistic art on the cards, but i don't know if that's true either - i love the tarot of the cloisters, and that's like stained glass.
i tend away from what i'll call the "crayon" style, which to me looks a bit childish, though it's probibly just "stylized", and i also tend away from the ethic themed decks. though i do like the native amercian art styles, so i can imagine i'd eventually get a deck in that vein. i suppose it's harder for me to say what i do like, as opposed to what i don't.
there's no deck in which i like every card - the robin wood, tarot of the cloisters, and the arthurian decks come close though.
there's a few others in which i love many cards, but not enough cards to love the deck - tarot of the old path, hansen-roberts, and a few i can't think of now. oh, and i like the universal waite deck's art, but again, only about half the cards.
and i love the art in the thoth, but i can't use it. it's too powerful and overwhelms me.
luv and light,
nexy
|
| New River |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
i agree with jade. she couldn't have said it better for me!
as a painter it is probably first about color for me, but just as important that the deck speaks to me as well. actually i prefer it if it Shouts!
love and light, New River
|
| EveAnna |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
I have only ever had one deck speak to me and that was the Original Rider Waite. I only own 2 decks, my first 1JJ Swiss I purchased because it was recommended to me and has only just started to respond to me after nearly 20 years :) (Mind you it was stuck on a shelf for 15 of those years lol) I always seem to be drawn to Rider Waite artwork or clones of the Rider Waite - although I do think the Dragon Tarot is very pretty.
I went into a bookshop last week and handled at least 20 decks of tarot cards, I was after the Diamond tarot, and the only one I liked was the Universal Waite. Ohh well :)
|
| Logiatrix |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
what do i like in a deck?
whenever i think i have it down--my taste and preferences--some new deck comes along and blows any consistencies out of the water! now i don't even try to figure it out, 'cuz i use about four decks, and they don't seem to have much in common...
morgan-greer: i love the deep, rich vibrant colors and basic symbolism. this is my main reading deck.
universal-waite: again, the symbolism works for me, and the colors are soothing. i call this one is my "study" deck, because with the numerous RWS books, it's very flexible for comparison and analysis.
legend (arthurian): this deck is just simply beautiful to me. i use it for story-building, dreamwork, the occasional reading...and just to look at!
i'm also currently checking out the osho-zen--i already like the artwork and card titles. it would be nice to have a more contemporary deck to work with.
:)
i guess i just look for a "connection"--when there's not a CONNECTION, it goes in the COLLECTION!
:D :D :D
|
| purplelady |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
I'm a straight white woman but seem to have a preference for the radical feminist and "ethnic" decks...........go figure!
|
| truthsayer |
06 Sep 2001 |
|
i've given up trying to figure out what kinds of decks attract me. about the time i say i don't like decks using photos and computers, i find one that i like--the rock and roll tarot. when i say i prefer decks w/ pastel colors, i find a color shocker i love. i start collecting celtic decks b/c i feel connected to them and then i find a native american style deck--the vision quest i like better. \o/ search me! i'm clueless why i'm attracted to some decks and unattracted to others.
|
| Mojo |
07 Sep 2001 |
|
Different reasons for different decks.
As a general rule, I like a deck which follows the basic Waite-Smith imagery for the most part. There are of course exceptions to this, like the Cosmic Tribe which very loosely follows it, taking a lot of liberties, and the Secret Tarots by Lo Scarabeo, which throws in some really out-there variations.
Also, I usually avoid decks with pips instead of scenes on the Minor Arcana. A rare exception for me is Tarocchi Bizzaro, which is a fairly rare deck in which the majors are drawn by Italy's most famous political cartoonist.
Since I find Tarot to be very seductive in its practice, I am drawn to decks which highlight the erotic nature of Tarot. Again, the Cosmic Tribe comes to mind, as does the really-out-there Tarocchi dei Giardini de Priapo (Tarot of the Garden of Penises - gotta love those Italians!).
As for the Waite-Smith clones, I have certain cards that I use to judge whether a deck is right for me. Usually they're the cards that can have varied meanings for me, so I need them to be true to these cards.
Some of the specific things that have drawn me to certain decks are:
Napo Tarot This one breaks my rule about cards with keywords on them. But I love the Argentinian artwork.
Xultan Mayan Tarot This is a really different deck using a whole different set of symbolism. But I'm a major fan of Central and South American history and culture, so I couldn't resist the fabulous Mayan symbols.
Karma Music Tarot One of the few "modern" Tarots I find appealing. And I can't explain why!
Tarocchi Collezione This is another one with pips for the Minor Arcana, but the majors and the court cards are represented with puppets. The artwork is fascinating, and it's another very rare one and it's a numbered and signed deck, which added to the appeal.
And of course, the Royal Fez which has the central figures in each card in color, but the backgrounds in pen and ink. It's not the best artwork of my decks, but there is just something primitive about it. I also like that none of the cards are titled. Nothing detracts from the image in reading with this deck, which is why I use it almost exclusively for readings.
|
| Elphaba |
08 Sep 2001 |
|
I go for a certain type of art as well. I've noticed that I'm drawn to decks that use a lot of blues, greens, purples and rich colours. I'm not a big fan of the watery, watercoloured decks. L:AT is as far as I'll go down that path. I'm really drawn to decks that use alot of outdoor scenes with moon, stars, trees, water.
Celtic Wisdom: so colourful, just vibrant and wonderful, I wouldn't like the artwork without the colour though.
Legend:Arthurian Tarot: I bought this deck for the Cernunnos card :) which pretty much sums up my perfect tarot card, the rest of the deck comes pretty close as well.
Goddes Knowledge: It really doesn't get much better than this art-wise and for me art this good replaces any need for symbols or systems. The pictures are enough. They make me just kind of nod my head...yesss :) (I'm getting this same feeling when I look at the Mary-El pics)
I really don't respond to the older, traditional decks and I will probably never buy one of the Rider-Waites. This is a really interesting question and I'd never thought about what exactly drew me to my decks. I think I definately pick my decks more like I'd pick a painting than a tool set.
|
| Talisman |
08 Sep 2001 |
|
Elphaba,
"I think I definately pick my decks more like I'd pick a painting than a tool set."
You put this perfectly. I'm not sure it is the right way to go about it, but I do know that I feel the same way you do.
And, this is an endlessly interesting topic.
Talisman
|
| destinyawaitsme |
08 Sep 2001 |
|
I generally like deck with more realisitc pictures...rather than cartoonish, but I love the Zerner Farber and the Art Noveau. I also like decks that have pictures on the minors, not just 7 cups for the 7 of cups. But I lvoe Thoth deck, so basically I just go by whatever calls out my name...I fell in love witht he Wheel of Change tarot.... pretty nice deck.
|
| Talisman |
08 Sep 2001 |
|
destinyawaitsme,
I think the Wheel of Change deck is terrific, and I love to just look through these cards. Also love the book with the deck.
Unfortunately, I have never been able to read with it. So, for me, it is my one "collector's deck." But I'll never be sorry I bought it.
Talisman
|
| MeeWah |
08 Sep 2001 |
|
Am visually oriented, so what usually appeals are the artwork, the archetypal & cultural symbolisms utilized.
Smith (Rider)-Waite: At the time, it was the only deck available besides non-Tarot decks so I bought it. I appreciate it as a definitive deck when it comes to symbolical representations. It is the deck I use to compare other decks.
The Chinese Tarot: The artwork is superb; its symbology based loosely on the Smith-Waite, traditions & mythology of ancient China. The impressions are just a bit different to make this deck interesting.
The Ancient Egyptian by Clive Barrett: Again, the artwork is superb; the images loosely based on Smith-Waite, the traditions & mythology of ancient Egypt with references to the Qabalah. The impressions from this deck are also a bit different.
The Robin Wood: The artwork & its Pagan theme are what drew me to this deck. The book was not available then, but it basically follows the Smith-Waite tradition from a Pagan view.
The Cosmic Tribe Tarot: Until I stumbled on this deck, I did not care for decks that appear to be photo-computer generated art montages. The artwork is stunning & clever--even tongue-in-cheek. The deck is also distinguished for its 3 versions of The Lovers card to cover the traditional & alternative life-styles.
Legend, the Arthurian Tarot: The legend of Arthur & his knights has long interested me. As a theme deck it seems to be thoroughly steeped in the Arthurian traditions, so there is a lot of material to absorb. I am still getting acquainted with it.
The Nigel Jackson Tarot: Decks with a watercolor appearance do not usually attract me (not that I do not like watercolors) but this one did; also its background in Pythagorean numerology & the Qabalah. Strength is 11 instead of 8; Justice is 8 instead of 11. Swords are Fire & Wands are Air. I am still getting acquainted with the differences so have not used the deck for readings yet, only to play with.
The Vertigo Tarot: Its basis in comic-book characters & its shadow qualities are what sold me. It is definitely a non-traditional deck! It works well as a shadow deck.
|
The Choosing your cards... thread was originally posted on 06 Sep 2001 in the Tarot Decks board, and is now archived in the Forum Library. Read the active threads in Tarot Decks, or read more archived threads.
|