Aoife
.....
I'll make an image of this spread, soon, once it is finished...Aoife said:The cards:
..........La Lune
..........Le Bateleur reversed..........L'Etoille..........Le Soleil
..................Past..........................Present...........Future
True, but this is an optional rule. Optional rules are typically done once one has already been interpreting the spread and it would seem that applying on of the optional rules would clarify something.~ The 20th Rule states that cards can be placed on either side of La Lune to give information about the two personages on the left and right.
I drew:
...........La Force reversed...... La Lune....... XIII reversed
yesTo develop the reading:
- would you apply solution cards to the two reversed cards?
or
yes, always follow gazes, reversed or upright. But, all reversed cards are eventually uprighted. So, imagine all reversed cards in a row uprighted and follow any gazes imagining the gazes that result from uprighting the card (this becomes quite simple with practice). Then, apply the solution cards to the next row.- would you leave them reversed and place a card to the left of La Force to see what she is regarding?
gotta look at the 17th rule, don't know much about that "head" representing thing. But, when the card is uprighted, the skeleton will regard a card to the right.- leaving them reversed, would you apply the 17th Rule and place a card to the right of XIII reversed - to give a sense of who the head represents?
Paul, wouldn't L'Amoureux and Le Soleil count as a repeating of the communication motif? They both show people relating with each other on a normal, everyday level (I believe they're the only two cards in the deck that show that), and to reinforce it, they're at either end of a line.Paul said:Why I wasn't as enamored with the "communication" motif is that is wasn't repeated (Law of Duality/Two). I couldn't reconcile communication with Le Monde, but I could reconcile one-pointed-ness with expansion.
Lee said:Paul, wouldn't L'Amoureux and Le Soleil count as a repeating of the communication motif? They both show people relating with each other on a normal, everyday level (I believe they're the only two cards in the deck that show that), and to reinforce it, they're at either end of a line.