foolish said:
Actually, my take on The Bateleur is that he is a representative of the Church - possibly a priest (see my thread on "Who is The Bateleur"
http://tarotforum.net/showthread.php?t=152530 in this section).
I see him more as Adam, fallen, a man of vice (below the devil in 3x7 layout) and the Charioteer as man taken on the clothes of the second Adam, christ, a man of virtue and perfect love (of God and Man), from which virtue arises (the middle rank of 3x7, defined beginning, middle and end by the virtue cards - from perfect love comes perfect virtue, as St. Augustine said, that allow us sustain the viscitudes of life).
He may be seen, I think, as a parody of a priest:
quote:
About whom we complain and on what evidence. Who invented the game? I answer upon the origins of three kinds of games of chance, dice, cards and triumphs. All these St. Thomas and many others agree were invented by the devil and explain it in this manner. For in the early church the Bishop of a community formed parish churches and chapels, so that each community had its bishop and parish priests and chaplains and collected holy relics of the Saints and consecrated the altars and the chalices and the hosts. And all the faithful congregated together at the churches in large numbers to celebrated Christ’s birth. And of such magnitude was their divine praise, that by their songs and organs the air and the whole universe was filled with praises. And from thence the spirits fled to the lower regions where the great Lucifer asked them why so many had fled the light. Thereupon a demon named Azarus arose and explained why they had fled. “But”, he added, “if you have the strength to obey me, I shall overturn them to forswear God and love yourself.” “And what will you do?' Lucifer asked. “I shall set up”, Azarus replied, “in the towns and the encampments and the villages the bishopric of the gambling house, and for bishop a true cheat. On the night of the Nativity more people will come to our church than to God’s. Our parishes will be the tavern, the tavern keeper our priests, the wine cellar our chapel, the cellarman our chaplain. Our sacristy will be the house bank, dice made of animal bones our holy relics, the cards our images, the bench our altar, the playing table our holy paten, the goblet of wine our chalice, a gold coin our host, the dice will be the Missal, whose pages are the cards and triumphs.”
end quote
see translation of Steele Sermon here:
http://www.tarotpedia.com/wiki/Sermones_de_Ludo_Cum_Aliis
Priest, parody or otherwise the bateleur - relying on illustration rather than the vagaries of interpretation - is portrayed as
standing, the fool and charioteer are
journeying.
Plus - don't characters on the wheel wear asses ears, like the fool? Why do we connect them with the bateleur?
I see the sequence as a Mirror of Love - of Cupidatas in the first rank (the lover), virtue as the perfection of love in the second rank and caritas, the love of G-d in the last (last judgment - defined as the exemplar of caritas, G-ds love, in Augustin theology). The theme of love is introduced by fool and magician as in Plato:
quote
"And as his parentage is, so also are his fortunes. In the first place he is always poor, and anything but tender and fair, as the many imagine him; and he is rough and squalid, and has no shoes, nor a house to dwell in; on the bare earth exposed he lies under the open heaven, in-the streets, or at the doors of houses, taking his rest; and like his mother he is always in distress.
"Like his father too, whom he also partly resembles, he is always plotting against the fair and good; he is bold, enterprising, strong, a mighty hunter, always weaving some intrigue or other, keen in the pursuit of wisdom, fertile in resources; a philosopher at all times, terrible as an magician, wizard, sophist. He is by nature neither mortal nor immortal, but alive and flourishing at one moment when he is in plenty, and dead at another moment, and again alive by reason of his father's nature. But that which is always flowing in is always flowing out, and so he is never in want and never in wealth; and, further, he is in a mean between ignorance and knowledge."
end quote from The Symposium by Plato.