firemaiden
Another old AT'er commemorative bump for fun, eh, Gregory? Got nothing else to do ? I can't believe I missed this discussion. I had in my early days on AT (2002 or so) posed a similar question "do you have to believe in tarot for it to work" ? to which many people, delightfully, replied "no" -- which engendered a really fun flame war.
The original question is wonderful, (Question everything ! Subvert the dominant paradigm !) and brings up all sorts of basic philosophical and probably un-answerable questions about tarot.
How does Tarot work ?
Does tarot work ?
What does "tarot working" look like ?
What does tarot NOT working look like ?
I would like to say I think the tarot "does NOT work". But the tarot 'NOT working", looks just about the same as the tarot "working" ... sort of like how NOT believing in God amounts to pretty much the same thing as believing in God, if that God is un-nameable, invisible, everywhere, and hence ... alas, nowhere.
No, the tarot does not work, and no, there is no intelligent entity in a blue suit (with moon boots) sitting on a white cloud lining up the cards.
Yes, when I turn over a card in response to a question (ANY question : "how many fingers am I holding up ?" "Why is there air ?" "Does Johnny love me ?" "Who am I" "What's fer breakfast ?" ** see answers below) chances are --- the card I turn over will strike some incredible (to me) resonance with the question. But if not ? There is most usually at least SOME kind of meaning that can be teased out, if ever so tenuously.
________________
** Answers to above questions : (read upside down).
1) how many fingers am I holding up ? => XII -- "twelve" or, "I can't commit to that right now"
2) "Why is there air ? = Two of Wands : "to encircle the globe."
3) "Does Johnny love me ?" => Queen of Cups reversed : "He doesn't know you exist."
4) "Who am I ?" => five of wands Rx : "an iconoclast."
5) "What's fer breakfast ? => 9 of cups : "your heart's desire."
The original question is wonderful, (Question everything ! Subvert the dominant paradigm !) and brings up all sorts of basic philosophical and probably un-answerable questions about tarot.
How does Tarot work ?
Does tarot work ?
What does "tarot working" look like ?
What does tarot NOT working look like ?
I would like to say I think the tarot "does NOT work". But the tarot 'NOT working", looks just about the same as the tarot "working" ... sort of like how NOT believing in God amounts to pretty much the same thing as believing in God, if that God is un-nameable, invisible, everywhere, and hence ... alas, nowhere.
No, the tarot does not work, and no, there is no intelligent entity in a blue suit (with moon boots) sitting on a white cloud lining up the cards.
Yes, when I turn over a card in response to a question (ANY question : "how many fingers am I holding up ?" "Why is there air ?" "Does Johnny love me ?" "Who am I" "What's fer breakfast ?" ** see answers below) chances are --- the card I turn over will strike some incredible (to me) resonance with the question. But if not ? There is most usually at least SOME kind of meaning that can be teased out, if ever so tenuously.
________________
** Answers to above questions : (read upside down).
1) how many fingers am I holding up ? => XII -- "twelve" or, "I can't commit to that right now"
2) "Why is there air ? = Two of Wands : "to encircle the globe."
3) "Does Johnny love me ?" => Queen of Cups reversed : "He doesn't know you exist."
4) "Who am I ?" => five of wands Rx : "an iconoclast."
5) "What's fer breakfast ? => 9 of cups : "your heart's desire."