Hello,
I have this deck, the version with lilac borders. I was not aware that it was out of print. There is an older version with blue-grey borders apparently, and if you can get this one, it seems better to me because the borders look better (the lilac borders are not even, the bottom border is wider, and there is the nam of the cards in several languages along the right vertical border.... I am never fond of this. The older version is simpler and looks better IMO)
Apart from the borders, I really like this deck for the art. But it does not always follow tradition, some cards are RWS inspired but many others look different. A few seem Thoth inspired, but not all. For that reason I find it a little difficult to read with this deck. I like when decks bring a new way to look at a card, new symbolism, new way to depict a card, but it throws me when I meet a card and the picture depicts something that seems entirely different from the traditional meaning of that card.... For example I like when the five of wands depicts some sort of conflict, rivalry, debate, play fight..... here it is the two of wands that seems to depict that sort of thing. The five of wands pictures five wands bearing birds heads (like in Thoth), erupting from a volcano, not far from a smiling sphynx and an ostrich (the big bird, sorry if I have the name wrong). So it could mean rivalry, someone putting another to test... but there seems to be more into this image than that, and the image is really very different from a traditional 5 of wands. Many cards are like that.
If you go deeper into the deck you will find it charming and interesting, but at first sight it can be a tad confusing if you are used to read with traditional imagerie. It depends if you like that sort of escape from tradition or not.
The art is really attractive, in a naive sort of way, I find.