Hi, LB. I've been using this new way of reading lately whenever I do my practice 3 card spread! It's been so much fun.
I am slowly but beginning to understand it
, was doing ok until I started to read back on my relationship readings according to this method, and I got a bit confused at times because of how questions were asked
These type of questions got me stuck.
I feel silly, like I should get these ... but I am not sure if I am getting it, so here I am
<Confused 1> "Where is my relationship going with X(male)?" was a question and no court card.
I would usually try and see each card showing a state of relationship itself. But when using this method, no court card means this reading is all about myself..... So should this reading be interpreted as how I will evolve in the relationship with X? (uhg.. I am unable to put these in words right, I hope I am making myself clear ...)
How about in a case where a question was "how does X feel about me?"
Little Baron said:
The one thing that I do stick to with this kind of reading, when it comes to position 2 and 3, is that the gender is fixed. If a knight comes up, then it is a male. The same for a king.
<Confused 2> Let's say this time the only court card comes up is a queen on position 2. The gender is fixed, so I am "off stage" and am sharing a card on position 1 with this queen(female) who is somehow influencing how X feels about me? (or is X even there in this case? because there is no knight or king card)
<Confused 3> What if a queen comes up on position 2, and a knight/king comes up on position 3. X the knight/king then, right?
I am off-stage sharing a card on position 1 with someone(the queen:female) on position 2 who is tied somehow to X and affecting how X feels about me?
Could you help me understand these?
"confused" moon_shadow