kwaw
Aeon418 said:Fair enough. What are your "certain qualifications". I take it you mean a narrower definition of the word.
On the contrary, the very broad definition of the word and the many ways in which Liber Al may be interpreted allow me to confidently say 'yes' without fear that I cannot provide sufficient qualification to answer any objection. The question is flawed. However, I am not just being a 'king of swords' here, and think beyond the point of the question being flawed the book of thoth can be considered a 'pagan themed' deck; I refer you to Ross Caldwell's post who has already highlighted the points I was preparing to make and to my previous [according to Aeon beside the point] posts re: crowley and paganism in general.
Re: the quote about 'inauguration of paganism in a purer form' which I was quoting from memory, being home I have been able to look it up and Ross's memory is obviously better than mine in that the word is 'restore' not 'inaugurate' [confessions p.839].
Kwaw