Minderwiz
Thanks for that explanation. I must admit I've never heard of him but knowing you, I fully accept that his intentions are honourable and he believes what he says. However I still find some of his statements at total variance with what we know of the practice of Astrology. I have similar issues with Noel Tyl, who insists on redefining Peregrine to mean something totally different from it's proper meaning. His excuse is/was that the original meaning has fallen out of use and the word can be appropriated for a new meaning.
Beginner students reading his work and indeed that of Raymond Navarro, will pick up take these statements as a true reflection of How Astrology has always been practiced. It would be better if they explained the changes they have made and their reasons for doing it.
Incidentally did you receive any rationale for what he was doing?
Beginner students reading his work and indeed that of Raymond Navarro, will pick up take these statements as a true reflection of How Astrology has always been practiced. It would be better if they explained the changes they have made and their reasons for doing it.
Incidentally did you receive any rationale for what he was doing?