Barbaras Ahajusts said:
If any of this didn't answer any questions, Purple scorp will be able to!
Barbara
LOL Barbara, you crack me up.
mccrary said:
I am running Windows 2000 (okay, shoot me) I have NET 2.0 downloaded but when installing itself it returns some blasted error that I am missing some ADM file, whatever the crap that is. I have no problem with 6.5, so unless there is a reason 7.0 is so much better, it will remain a low priority. Any reason why I should move it up, is there that much difference?
DraagonStorm said:
Yes, I'm interested too, is there much difference in 7.0?
DraagonStorm
Hi all.
I have 7.0 installed with Windows 2000 on my home computer and am having no problems with it. By the same token, I am having problems with 7.0 and Windows 2000 on my work computer. Not so much with the installation, but with the registering of the software. I think it's a firewall problem (though I had no problem registering 6.5). I'm currently working through this issue with Richard.
Just to clarify, there are no major differences between the functionality of Orphalese 6.5 and 7.0. So, there is no real reason to upgrade to 7.0 at this stage. If 6.5 is working for you, you may as well stay with that.
Richard wanted to rewrite Orphalese to work with NET Framework 2.0, and that's why he released version 7.0. It opens up some new pathways for him and the future of the software.
Now, you will need to install NET Framework 2.0 if you want to install Orphalese 7.0, or future versions of the Orphalese software. NET Framework 2.0 can happily co-exist on the same computer as 1.0. I don't recall having difficulty downloading 2.0. This is free Microsoft Software so there should be a variety of websites where you can download this from.
Hope this helps to clarify some of your questions.
BTW - I'm on holidays at the moment, so I'm not popping into AT as regularly as I was.
with love
purple_scorp