Aeon418 said:
Knowledge, in the mental sense, is merely a relationship between facts.
Dwtw
I countered your statement that 'knowledge, as such, does not exist'. But it most certainly does exist, just as much as the number 11 exists. Then you proceed to tell me it is nothing more than a relationship. Do relationships not exist either? (that's a rhetorical question, BTW)
Aeon418 said:
Here you seem to be lumping all knowledge into one basket, but anyway...
I am not lumping all knowledge together. That's your misunderstanding. I am merely listing a number of instances where the word 'know' is used in Liber AL. Presumably it has a certain importance in the text, or else it would not be referred to so many times. So I have lumped all instances of the word together, but that is not the same as concluding that they all mean the same thing.
The rest of what you have to say is your misreading of what was written, and projections of your own. I made no definitions of any of the instances of 'knowledge' in Liber AL. My only point was that it has an ontological status in the text. But I'd rather not get into a discussion about ontology. Save it for Liber A'ash.
As usual, you're picking at minutiae and have little to say about the broad theme of my posts. You seem more concerned about being right than about having a dialogue. But I guess it's important for you to have all that 'knowledge'...which means in your terms that you have nothing at all.
Litlluw
RLG
). Hence, the ignorant ("blind") see Thelema as being black magick, but the ones whose eyes have been opened to the possibility of something else see blue and gold.
