Barleywine
I hate to say it at this late date, but arguing the manner in which knowledge is gained and retained seems like "much ado about nothing" to me. I find tarot reading to be a supremely SYNTHETIC art that is much more than just stacking up bricks to make a structure. You can have a filing cabinet (or memory) full of all the keywords in world, drag them out and arrange them on your table, even put them in one of those Ishikawa "fishbone" diagrams the business types are so fond of, and still come up with an interpretation that is just as sterile as one a computer program would produce. Regardless of whether you memorize the meanings, look them up on-the-fly or choose to ignore them completely and go with spontaneous insights, it's how well you integrate the knowledge you've accumulated into the dynamic of the reading that matters most. I don't care how you may have learned it, it's how well you can use it that is the crux of a successful reading.
I would submit that eventually the "standard" meanings recede in your conscious awareness and are supplanted by the storehouse of personalized connotations that you have built up through long practice and that present themselves in a largely automatic fashion, immediately triggered by the sight of one card or another in the spread. All that remains is to blend their individual meanings, correspondences and positional values in a way that makes sense to the narrative. If this is "memorization," so be it; I simply see it as the way true understanding coalesces from the fragments of rote learning most of us encounter early in our trajectory.
I would submit that eventually the "standard" meanings recede in your conscious awareness and are supplanted by the storehouse of personalized connotations that you have built up through long practice and that present themselves in a largely automatic fashion, immediately triggered by the sight of one card or another in the spread. All that remains is to blend their individual meanings, correspondences and positional values in a way that makes sense to the narrative. If this is "memorization," so be it; I simply see it as the way true understanding coalesces from the fragments of rote learning most of us encounter early in our trajectory.