moderndayruth
That looks really useful too. Thank you!
Thank you for developing the camaraderie and support in the Thoth camp! Much appreciated!
That looks really useful too. Thank you!
There are aspects of Crowley's character that repulse almost everyone. Yes, even me. Then again there are probably aspects of my character that repulse some people. And the same is true of everyone else to a certain extent.Honestly, i had strong aversion for Crowley, before getting to Lon Milo's materials - wasn't it for his books and dvd's, and his laid back attitude - i'd never get to study the deck, Crowley personally did repulse me (still does to certain extent.)
Lon Milo DuQuette said:One thing I have learned in all these years is that it is a big mistake for me to spend too much of my precious time trying to guess or verify to my satisfaction whether or not this Brother or that Sister is behaving Thelemic-ly.
Give me a break! Who the f*ck am I to judge whether or not someone is living up to the Thelemic ideal? I have a hard enough time determining from moment-to-moment whether or not I am behaving Thelemic-ly.
Another question is what of that is true and to which extent.There are aspects of Crowley's character that repulse almost everyone.
Those make me sick, its one of the main reasons i stay away from anything organized in the spiritual camp.This is miles away from the typical white washed "holier-than-thou" guru figures that many people like to project their ideals of perfection upon.
Paths, Dignities, Hebrew Letters, Color Scales, Numerology, Projective Synthetic Geometry, Scrying... did miss anything?
Yeah, you missed just about everything LOL
But i like that! The problem is that the same card stand for numerous things of which i know nothing!The thing with a Hermetic deck is, to paraphrase Crowley "the deck is pictorial representation of the universe". Which pretty much means there is a card for any damn thing you can think of.
Check out a few pages of Liber 777
(I quite like Skinner's 'Magician's Tables' and hear good
things about Eshelman's 776 1/2 as expanded modern equivalents). You can relate angels, demons, gods, flowers, stones, cooking spices, times of day, geographical locations, animals both real and imagined, whatever. I think a copy of a book like one of these is invaluable to using the deck. For some insight into the application of that, DuQuette's Tarot of Ceremonial Magick companion book will be very useful, Cicero's Angel Magic or Zalewski's yellow brick are great.
I have to say I find Crowley a hugely inspiring figure. There's an element of nastiness that one would not want to emulate but I think of him as a man who lived life on a grand scale and was never afraid to experiment in a way that few of us can - with our hand on our heart - say we too follow.What I do like about Crowley is how he never tried to hide his faults. In fact he put them on display for everyone to see, published them far and wide, and rubbed his students faces in them whenever they were in danger of putting him on a pedestal. This is miles away from the typical white washed "holier-than-thou" guru figures that many people like to project their ideals of perfection upon. But you can guarantee that there are a couple of skeletons in the closet that eventually lead to a crisis of faith when they inevitably come out.
He wasn't caught up in the niceties and fakeness of social interaction. I am in awe of anyone who can do entirely as they want, as most of us cannot even dream of doing a fraction of what we would like. We pretend we do, but social constraints oppress us, work oppresses us, family oppresses us, friends oppress us whether we like it or not.
I have to say I find Crowley a hugely inspiring figure. There's an element of nastiness that one would not want to emulate but I think of him as a man who lived life on a grand scale and was never afraid to experiment in a way that few of us can - with our hand on our heart - say we too follow.
We don't like it usually, but on the other hand, the conventions have its purpose probably.He wasn't caught up in the niceties and fakeness of social interaction. I am in awe of anyone who can do entirely as they want, as most of us cannot even dream of doing a fraction of what we would like. We pretend we do, but social constraints oppress us, work oppresses us, family oppresses us, friends oppress us whether we like it or not.
I think he had a hyperactive imagination among other qualities - for what i read by some of his contemporaries - well meaning and humorous ones (but pls don't ask me for names, it was ages ago), that was exaggerated too.He got out there and lived intensely. I envy his ability to genuinely not care for niceties at the expense of truly living, the fiery quest to want truth. And this drama and larger than life passion is what makes me want to dive ever deeper into the deck!