Zephyros
Would you say that the above also explains why there is no overt Christ-figure in the deck?
Good point. I agree that a Mariological source for it detracts from Waite's deeper import. OTOH, Waite was not adverse to acknowledging layers of meaning, not all of which fit perfectly with each other. Mary's role as "womb" of Christ clearly has relevance here, which is obvious when the Ace of Cups is considered as Grail/Graal - a subject of particular import to Waite during the period when the deck was being designed (and is discussed in his book _The Hidden Church of the Holy Graal_, published in 1909 - the same year as the deck. I can see him laughing at arguments that try to pin any of his symbols down to a single, exclusive referent. If anything, he was inclusive when it came to symbols - as long as it followed a theme found in the Secret Tradition.Despite the Christian flavor of Waite's mysticism, after reading him the core of his doctrine is decidedly Kabalistic. When he came up with the idea of the reflected "M" I doubt he had Mary in mind, especially after reading the above.
Since Waite was relating a traditional and public tarot to the "Secret Tradition," while making it a practical deck for fortune-telling (see Pictorial Key to the Tarot where he makes his intent clear), Waite's intent was to transcend the particularities of any one religion. It's part of why he changed the title of the Pope card to Hierophant - a term used for "Speaker of Mysteries" of the Eleusinian mysteries, while still not making the deck only an Eleusinian deck. The allusions to various mystery traditions are there: the Demeter symbolism of the Empress, a one-liner where he equates the Hermit with Persephone transiting between the underworld and the world above, etc. The Secret Tradition transcends any single spiritual path, seeing, instead, facets of the Mystery of Faith in all of them.Would you say that the above also explains why there is no overt Christ-figure in the deck?
That's my aim, too. I've been working on it for over 20 years and have found plenty of references that show that he didn't see symbols as having single referents. That's why he talks about a Secret Tradition that extends for thousands of years and includes the ancient mystery traditions and not just Kabbalism (Jewish or Christian) or Catholicism.I know Waite's symbolism is full of layers. I've encountered many, many of them. My interest is to simply try and discover, as nearly as possible, how Waite himself viewed it, and also how he probably didn't view it.
Both the Symbols and RWS are part of the Trumps lineage. Most of the Trinick cards are recognizable cognates of the Tarot (even without reading Waite) as it had evolved into the 19th & early 20th century. But other than that, I don't find many of the images "remarkably similar" - except for the Lovers & Devil (Garden of Eden theme, mirroring freedom versus enslavement) and the High Priestess. Cards like the Hermit, Moon, Star, World, Magician (except that he's more "magical") and Pope/Hierophant are as indebted to the regular Tarot tradition as they are to the RWS deck which followed that tradition. Additionally, many (but certainly not all) of the remaining 13 (not counting Da'ath) can be recognized, but I wouldn't call them "remarkably similar" to the RWS in particular. Of course, once you've read Waite's FRC rituals the allusions are clearer.Smith's art is much different than Trinick's but many of the Great Symbols of the Paths are remarkably similar to the Waite-Smith images.