jmd
Some of the symbology and iconography is already discussed for most cards in other threads...
I thought it may also be useful and begin a new study on the 78 cards as to how each may be read in the context of a reading. Of course, and personally, in the specific situation at hand, a tiny aspect may arise as principal mantic source.
I thought too that it may be useful to proceed by one Atouts, followed by one pip, then a court, and then another pip.
...but rather than talking about it, let's begin!
__________
The Bateleur may often show that mastery over the tools, going to basics, studying, and engaging in learning may be what is either needed, called for, ...or even avoided.
It may depict a very masculine way of breaking things apart in order to see how it works... and then also be unable to put it back together. Learning how an ant works cannot simply be done by looking at its 'parts', but rather by understanding which comes, it seems, later than the Bateleur is at.
He may indeed give the illusion that he understands, but manipulating the situation, the elements, the tools, shows that he has possibly reached a practical knowledge of his environment: to switch a light on does not imply that he understands the workings of electricity.
I thought it may also be useful and begin a new study on the 78 cards as to how each may be read in the context of a reading. Of course, and personally, in the specific situation at hand, a tiny aspect may arise as principal mantic source.
I thought too that it may be useful to proceed by one Atouts, followed by one pip, then a court, and then another pip.
...but rather than talking about it, let's begin!
__________
The Bateleur may often show that mastery over the tools, going to basics, studying, and engaging in learning may be what is either needed, called for, ...or even avoided.
It may depict a very masculine way of breaking things apart in order to see how it works... and then also be unable to put it back together. Learning how an ant works cannot simply be done by looking at its 'parts', but rather by understanding which comes, it seems, later than the Bateleur is at.
He may indeed give the illusion that he understands, but manipulating the situation, the elements, the tools, shows that he has possibly reached a practical knowledge of his environment: to switch a light on does not imply that he understands the workings of electricity.