Le Fanu said:
I love this concept of subcollections.
I have a new one developing which is the "when Lo Scarabeo were just starting off" subcollection.
Caused by nostalgia for the times when the 80th LoS card was a list of maybe 10 or so decks... *wistful sighing...* Some, sadly, no longer with us... I have built up a completist subcollection of those early OOP LoS decks; the Sola Busca, Tarot of the Origins, Tarot of Casanova, Durer, Minchiate etc etc.
The named-artists sub-collection: Klimpt, Bosch, the Tapo-Durer, Brueghel, da Vinci Enigma, and I know there's another one, it's just evading my tongue at the moment. Stacks on the list - I definitely haven't been de-enabled on the Gauguin despite the sterling work of you and a bunch of others in That Other Thread.
The Scapini collection: More waiting to be bought, but the Vetrate (which kick-started this one by being gorgeous), the Lukumi, the Sibilla 800, the Mediaeval (the supposedly muddy version), and the Cary-Yale Visconti which he worked on, kicking off ...
The Visconti collection: the Cary-Yale, the Lo Scarabeo Gold Foil, the Lo Scarabeo mini, the Piedmont, and more to come as time and budget permits.
And now - the bloody signed-and-numbered-limited-edition one which, apparently, I've been unconsciously working on for a while (thanks, Rodney!).
I have no chance at all of buying for a while, and when I do, I think my best strategy in completionist terms would be to work on sub-collections rather than randomly buying decks that appeal. Then when I complete a sub-collection, I can reward myself with a random deck that appeals!
You know what? I consciously "collect" these and buy when I can whether I like them or not - and I like and use them all!