K I N G F E L I X
One gets the sense that meanings of Re-Horakhty have changed through the Ages as understanding of the Solar diety has adapted in step with Egyptian civilization’s course through history. For instance, the story I quoted before dates from the Ptolemaic period (relatively late in ‘antiquity’) and illustrates how the syncretic abrogates all prior ‘ordeals and rituals’ by reformulating relevant ‘words & signs’.
From Old Kingdom Egypt, Utterance 473 of the Pyramid Texts at Saqqara records both Re & Horakhty as distinct stages of the Sun’s daily cyclic journey: the ferries of heaven are launched by the day-barque for Re’s journey to Horakhty on the western horizon; and launched by the night-barque for Horakhty’s journey to Re on the east. Crossing the river of heaven, the deities become one another at the horizons, yet remain distinguished by the stage of the journey each makes.
This duality, seemingly reconciled by the magic of Naming, reflects a general human need to maintain ‘continuity’. By embodying the two names within the hieroglyphic reformulation ‘Re-Horakhty’ an act of abrogation has, in essence, occurred that alters the discourse by re-inventing one of its’ Key concepts. Where mythology/religion are concerned, the meta-narrative encompassing our studies of western civilization tends to characterize this process as an inevitable drift towards monotheism &/or empire. No small wonder that the rising heights of Egypt’s power during the ‘New Kingdom’ saw the abrogations of the hermaphrodite sun-king Akhenaten.
But, before his re-naming ceremony, Amenhotep IV built many temples in Amun’s cult centre at Karnak....
Oxford credentials said:
“The temples that he started to build here and elsewhere were dedicated not to Amun, however, but to a new form of the sun-god whose official name was ‘The living one, Ra-Horus of the horizon who rejoices in the horizon in his identity of light which is in the sun-disc’, a long formula that was soon enclosed in two cartouches just like the names of a king, and that was often preceded in royal inscriptions by the words ‘my father lives’. The name of the god could be shortened to ‘the living sun-disc’ or simply ‘the sun-disc’ (or, to use the Egyptian word, the Aten).”
- Ian Shaw, The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt
Later, Akhenaten changes the name formula again, removing Horus from the equation entirely, into: ‘the living one, Ra, ruler of the horizon.’ But within a century further abrogations have dealt with Amarna as the aberration, and ‘restore’ the names defaced during that period. Yet the pantheon of deities are viewed by eyes that have seen and been affected by religious upheaval; and the form their restored ‘Re-Horakhty’ took no doubt embodied this ‘new’ understanding...
Oxford credentials said:
“Every sunrise was a repetition of the ‘first occasion’, the creation of the world in the beginning. Ra himself went through the daily cycle of death and rebirth; at sunset he entered the netherworld, where he was regenerated and from which he was reborn in the morning as Ra-Horakhty. Light could not exist without darkness; without death there could be no regeneration and no life. Together with the sun-god the dead were also reborn; they joined Ra on his daily journey and went through the same eternal cycle of death and rebirth. Osiris, the god of the dead and the underworld, with whom the deceased were traditionally identified, was increasingly seen as an aspect of Ra, and the same held true for all other gods, for, if the sun-god was the primeval creator, then all the other gods had emerged from him and were therefore aspects of him. In this sense a tendency towards a form a monotheism is inherent in the religion of New Kingdom Egypt.”
- Ian Shaw, The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt
Of Course, the V.A.L.I.S. will tell you that Akhenaten spawned a hidden race who rules this world still, and is in fact a manifestation of the Macro Mind ‘itself’. The
Cryptica Scriptura also implies he was descended from ‘three-eyed’ telepathic deaf/mute invaders from the Sirius system who “covertly influence our history toward a fruitful end.” Along the way, Aiwass ‘helped’ Crowley pay his debt to Horus by having him take dictation. Thus you have thus; and here we are.... abrogating like its going out of style.
Which brings us to Asar & Isa...
Could be the fact these names are synonymous with characters otherwise known to us is in and of itself a hint about the means by which we are to interpret this riddle: not at face (behind the mask) value. Asar, near as I can tell, is an 18th century transliteration of ‘Osiris’ that was never actually used in ancient times.
So, then, abrogations may ensue based on entirely fictitious data?....
Luckily, One knows better than to be deceived by such a cheap disguise...right?
Isa may not specifically refer to the Pentagrammaton in most Islamic orthodoxies, but by invoking this Qu’ranic alias, Aiwass may be saying something about One’s relationship to the ‘magickal’ formula embodied in this particular ‘Name’. Mainstream Christianity tends to elevate their Savior beyond reach, yet Islam has always recognized this particular holy dude as a prophet no more a son of ‘God’ than anyOne else. In this sense, the formula that the YHShVH name embodies is attainable for every Human being.
With respect to verse 1.49, ‘abrogation’ as a term specific to Islamic legal exegesis may also be pointing to the Messenger’s role as a reformer, abrogating the outmoded and contradictory laws and social conventions of One’s predecessors; thereby serving as an allegory for the rebirth of Consciousness in Oneself & Society.
Ceci n’est pas une pipe! [Note: pseudonyms may be used for the same reason: Ceci n’est pas une pipe!]
Yet there is still a secret in Ra-Hoor-Khuit’s name: a ‘Nothing’ being flaunted before All, uniting Alpha & Omega:
the Zero completing One Circle...
So, how can Nothing unite anything?
‘Something’ isn’t made ‘of nothing’; but beginning and end are joined like a Serpent biting its own tail, just like the Octave returns to ‘C’. Then perhaps -Hoor- is that zen-proverbial ‘empty space’ that makes a -Door- or -Window- or a CUP useful: Splendor of the passage through which One is initiated!
Which, in a way, gets back to The Fool: for there can't really be a Secret if Nothing doesn't really exist....
....or does it?