zan_chan said:
Thanks for your help, Aeon. Um, maybe I understand? Will need to give it some deeper thought when I have more time.
This bit I'm not sure I get;
Why is the Fool always unharmed?
I think Crowley's metaphor is an extension of the principle that Energy cannot be created nor destroyed - only transformed.
Logically his example is flawed, because we know that atoms can be split. Probably an idea that was not widely known to the pubic for another year after the BoT was published. But the idea of an indivisible particle is still the quest of theoretical physics.
I am uncomfortable with 'unharmed' in Aeon's statement that you quoted, Zan. The term itself it relative, just as Aeon's statement below indicates - so I wouldn't waste time bending my mind around it, per se, just the idea that it represents.
The choice of the Divine into incarnation is also an extension of 'free will'. I haven't formed an opinion on that idea yet, but, I do remember seeing it in the "Conversations with God" series at the beginning of the last decade.
Aeon418 said:
Whatever happens in your life, whether you consider it positive or negative, has no effect on the spark of divinity within you. It is always unharmed, just like the Fool, but it is enriched by it's experiences.
What is difficult about the whole thing is the concept of "SOUL" - that divine spark - and how much of what we can conceptualize as 'being' is preserved in the 'memory' of the Energy of this spark? It is re-incarnation in its coldest, most incomprehensible sense. To make it understandable, we inevitably change its meaning.