I quite like the deck so far but I find the astrological hints on many cards confusing. There's a lot of Capricorn in the Pentacles... also in cards that GD associates with Taurus or Virgo.
I like the tiles on many cards. They make it easier to "combine" cards side by side, all the figures seem to stand on one stage. In the Renaissance, the construction of a perspective grid often resulted in tiled floors, so these tiles fit into the retro atmosphere. Especially since many cards use the traditional Dreiplan aerial perspective: brownish colors in the foreground closest to the viewer, green in the middle ground, and pale grey-blue in the background. That gives depth, and it's exactly what Bosch and other Flemish Renaissance and Mannerist painters did.
It's written everywhere that the artist painted with oil on wood panels... but to my eye, some cards look as though he used oil pastels. It's difficult to judge, maybe he used more than one technique. But there's a fuzzy or fluffy feeling about the gradients.
Most cards are very beautiful, for example Wheel of Fortune and Judgement. I have a problem with some of the faces - they look too contemporary, too modern, seem to wear make up. The women's ponytail hairstyles also stand out in some cards.... it's horrible to be so picky but I am :-( and I confess, the very transparent clothing is also a bit disturbing.
What I like: the concept, the borders, the eclectic madness, the nod to the Sola Busca, the ease with which cards connect , the Bosch-like surrealism, the Botticelli-like decorative elements, the colours.
I think this is a very interesting deck to work with in spite of my question marks. It fits beautifully into my faux-Renaissance sub-collection, and also into my all-that-glitters-and-is-gold subcollection.