The Knight of Batons
I think this is probably the most striking card of the bunch. For a long time I've complained about the representation of this Knight on the Conver, but have never been happy with it on the Dodal or Noblet either. I've pointed out before in a comparison how much I prefer the Drago version.
Here again, the BN Mold basically agrees with the Drago
BN Mold and Drago
Noblet, Dodal, Conver
The Noblet, Dodal and Conver, to me, all seem "confused" about how to draw the bottom of the horse. Conver's horse looks like it is wearing a "blanket" that is covering almost the entire horse. Dodal seems to know that one of the legs should be raised in the front, but the art looks like something from the 1930s! Noblet handles it best of the three, clearly showing two front legs, and two back legs.
It's interesting to look at the mold and the Drago, and notice that it is actually the other front leg, the one closest to the viewer, that is raised in their version. The front of the horse has a large flower shape, and a similar shape is also found on the knee of the Knight. Conver clearly also has the flower shape, Dodal is very close, it's different on the Noblet and missing on the Drago.
Conver is the only one to show a "cap" on the hat.
The Mold and the Drago agree with the style of the Noblet and Dodal for the way the ground is presented.
The branch in the Knights hand is pretty similar in all depictions, Conver having the least distinction where the two branches are cut off.
Noblet, Dodal, and Conver all see a floral pattern on the Knights coat. The Mold and the Drago see buttons.
I find the Knight of Batons to be one of the most interesting cards for comparison.