roppo
raises his hand silently, too.
Very interesting.
Very interesting.
The first section of the book, The Theory of the Tarot, is neatly divided into three sections, so I suppose we could start working through them. (Section 1: p.4 - 12. Section 2: p.12 - 25. Section 3: p.25 - 48) My only worry is that there is a lot of diverse material in each of the seperate sections so it could get confusing.Marion said:So, Aeon418, why don't you try laying out a proposed study plan for discussion? It would be a place to start. Like the idea of the study group, and we have several here who have studied it in depth to keep the thoughts moving.
Sigh - if we must. Isn't the first part mainly about the Tarot as a depiction of the Universe? He says a lot about Kabbalah, Tree of Life, Tetragrammaton and the elements? This would start in Section 2. Section 1 is about the connection of Tarot to the teachings of the Golden Dawn, Crowley setting himself in context. I don't know how long we should dwell on that.Aeon418 said:The first section of the book, The Theory of the Tarot, is neatly divided into three sections, so I suppose we could start working through them. (Section 1: p.4 - 12. Section 2: p.12 - 25. Section 3: p.25 - 48) My only worry is that there is a lot of diverse material in each of the seperate sections so it could get confusing.