Sylvie Steinbach said:
I hope with this thread to be able to communicate and clarify the methodology introduced in my first book; as you know I want to create a new generation of Lenormand readers who don't just talk but walk the talk.
Tell me where you are with my methodology and what have been your difficulties so far? Tarotcardrose opened the door to the idea...Where are you at, MissDivine?
Hi Sylvie,
Since I had a long break from the cards, I am not even going to try multi-level readings until I stop stumbling with even a short no lay-out readings.
Often the answers are very clear, depending on what cards are drawn ofcourse.
But there are also times the cards have me very confused.
For instance, I did a reading for myself recently and it was about a guy I used to be with for several years. We've always stayed in contact on MSN. He's been wanting to come over to see my new place (I just moved in Februari) but I kept putting off to see him.
So I did a reading, because I know him all too well to know he doesn't want to come over ONLY to see my new home.
My question was...''what are his intentions with me'' so I obviously charged the man card.
The cards were so clear, I only needed 2 on the left and 2 on the right.
Dog+heart+man+woman+ring
I immediately saw he is romantically involved with someone already. DOG+HEART. On the right I see he will get together with a woman (either through a date, meeting, whatever. With the ring beside it I would say his intentions are a relationship, not just a fling eventually.
Now the part I stumble on is this:
Because I am doing a reading for myself, does that woman represent me?
If I am reading for someone else I usually (but not always)charge both key cards (man and woman) just in case I draw cards like this.
The other thing is, in all my other readings I've done where a man or woman was already involved with someone else (DOG), and the intentions were honest with my querent, I'd see a break-up with the dog.
Well I saw no break-up with the dog in this reading. Yet I also see a relationship in his future with a new woman, (or that woman represented me).
But where is the break-up wit the Dog?
See stupid little stuff like this throw me completely off track at times. And I just recently did a reading like this for a friend with the same question about a man she was interested in.
I charged the key card man, neglected to charge the woman card, and got:
BEAR+FISH+MAN+KEY+WOMAN+RING
Beautiful layout...no other woman obviously at the moment. (No Sylvie, I don't race through readings like this, but I'm just trying to make clear only what I don't get). In his future I see he will for sure end up with a woman.
So my friend asks, who is that woman in his future, another woman or me?
I told her it could be both, as I neglected to charge the key card.
I THINK I am correct, no? Or does the woman represent her anyway?
I didn't post these readings to have these cards read for me. I posted them because I don't know how to explain my reading troubles any other way.
Maybe the answer you have for me is simple...Redo the the readings and charge both key cards.
But in multi-level readings we've used key cards that weren't charged if they were significant...
You said:''there is a reason why I want to release workbooks. They will be workbooks so that you can learn if you can't come to learn it from me live!''
Well, thank heavens for that!