rwcarter
As a birthday present, I was given a copy of the Dynamic Spreads Deck by BK Reichle, who I believe is a member here at Aeclectic. It's put out by Uvesa Publishing and the ISBN is 978-0-615-69732-1. (It's currently in stock at Amazon.) Just like the Deck of 1000 Spreads, it's a spreadcrafting tool.
Before I get into any comparisons between the two systems, I'll focus on the DSD. My first impression was that the system comes in a HUGE box. I don't even think I have tarot sets with companion books that are in boxes this big. The cards come in a recipe-style flip top box. There's a space in the lid to hold a pen or pencil, which I think is a nice touch. There's a weird paperboard spacer in the box that's too wide to sit square in the box, so it flattens at the back of the box. There are 105 cards that are divided into 6 sections. And there are some post-it notes and 19 half-sized cards included in the recipe box. (The outer box is as thick as it is because of the thickness of the recipe box.)
Then I pulled out the companion book, which is long, thin and narrow (accounting for the tallness of the outer box). I don't know whose idea it was to use green print on an off-white background for the text in the book, but I find it very hard to read the text unless I'm under strong light. Thinking it might just be me, I asked someone else if they could read the text, and they had the same problems. It's also difficult to get the book back into the box without removing the spacers for the recipe box. And if you put the spacers back in wrong, then you can't put the recipe box back in.
The cards themselves are oriented in landscape mode, which I'm still not sure if I like or not. They are divided into the following categories:
The Theme cards are just what one would expect - overarching themes for readings, such as "Love/Passion/Sex," "Home life," and "Non-romantic partnerships." A couple of the cards even have fill-in-the-blanks, such as "My connection with:_____________________" and "An event occurring on: _____/_____/_____". I think the themes do a pretty good job of covering the range of themes on which we do readings. Because every theme could never be captured, I wish some blank cards had been included. (None are included for any of the sections, which was an unfortunate oversight.)
The EXPLORE sets of cards is where I have another issue with the set - a number of the cards have two topics on them in a yin/yang kind of balance, such as "My strength in this situation/My challenge in this situation," My perception/The reality," and "What inspires me/What distracts me that I'm not aware of ." As a general rule, that's fine, but I can think of circumstances in which I might want to only look at one part of the card and then I'm left with either ignoring the other part, pulling a card I don't want to pull or covering that part of the card with a post-it note. Again, not a huge deal, but it would've been nice to not have to do that.
One of the things I really like about the Explore cards is that none of them are phrased as Yes/No questions, as I don't believe Tarot does a good job of answering those.
The Conclusion cards are roughly divided into outcome cards (5), advice cards (7) and a "What should I learn from this?" card. Again, a good range of outcomes, but a blank card or two that one could use for other outcomes would've been nice.
The timing cards are not used for determining a time frame in which something shown in the reading will occur but are for setting the time frame in advance. No card is placed on the timing card, but instead it sits as part of the reading as a focus of intention. Two of the half-sized cards are actually "Choice A" and "Choice B" cards for looking at options. The other cards cover "Now", the four seasons, "Today", "This week", "This month" and four cards each for the Next or Past years, months, weeks and days with a fill-in-the-blank space to indicate a number. (If there's any indication in the book as to whether a dry-erase marker will work on the cards, I don't see it.)
The companion book shows different spreads created by the author and other tarot luminaries who have tried out the system, goes into more depth on each card in the deck and suggests other cards that could be used with a given card, gives sample fictional readings and has an appendix of a nice cross-section of recommended books.
Now to the obvious comparisons between Dynamic Spreads Deck (DSD) and Deck of 1000 Spreads (DKS):
I don't think either system is perfect, nor do I think one is better than the other. In an ideal world, one would pick and choose the best cards from each system to produce spreads than can't be produced with either system alone.
Rodney
Before I get into any comparisons between the two systems, I'll focus on the DSD. My first impression was that the system comes in a HUGE box. I don't even think I have tarot sets with companion books that are in boxes this big. The cards come in a recipe-style flip top box. There's a space in the lid to hold a pen or pencil, which I think is a nice touch. There's a weird paperboard spacer in the box that's too wide to sit square in the box, so it flattens at the back of the box. There are 105 cards that are divided into 6 sections. And there are some post-it notes and 19 half-sized cards included in the recipe box. (The outer box is as thick as it is because of the thickness of the recipe box.)
Then I pulled out the companion book, which is long, thin and narrow (accounting for the tallness of the outer box). I don't know whose idea it was to use green print on an off-white background for the text in the book, but I find it very hard to read the text unless I'm under strong light. Thinking it might just be me, I asked someone else if they could read the text, and they had the same problems. It's also difficult to get the book back into the box without removing the spacers for the recipe box. And if you put the spacers back in wrong, then you can't put the recipe box back in.
The cards themselves are oriented in landscape mode, which I'm still not sure if I like or not. They are divided into the following categories:
- Theme
- EXPLORE Me
- EXPLORE Considerations
- EXPLORE Group Interactions
- EXPLORE Actions
- Conclusion
The Theme cards are just what one would expect - overarching themes for readings, such as "Love/Passion/Sex," "Home life," and "Non-romantic partnerships." A couple of the cards even have fill-in-the-blanks, such as "My connection with:_____________________" and "An event occurring on: _____/_____/_____". I think the themes do a pretty good job of covering the range of themes on which we do readings. Because every theme could never be captured, I wish some blank cards had been included. (None are included for any of the sections, which was an unfortunate oversight.)
The EXPLORE sets of cards is where I have another issue with the set - a number of the cards have two topics on them in a yin/yang kind of balance, such as "My strength in this situation/My challenge in this situation," My perception/The reality," and "What inspires me/What distracts me that I'm not aware of ." As a general rule, that's fine, but I can think of circumstances in which I might want to only look at one part of the card and then I'm left with either ignoring the other part, pulling a card I don't want to pull or covering that part of the card with a post-it note. Again, not a huge deal, but it would've been nice to not have to do that.
One of the things I really like about the Explore cards is that none of them are phrased as Yes/No questions, as I don't believe Tarot does a good job of answering those.
The Conclusion cards are roughly divided into outcome cards (5), advice cards (7) and a "What should I learn from this?" card. Again, a good range of outcomes, but a blank card or two that one could use for other outcomes would've been nice.
The timing cards are not used for determining a time frame in which something shown in the reading will occur but are for setting the time frame in advance. No card is placed on the timing card, but instead it sits as part of the reading as a focus of intention. Two of the half-sized cards are actually "Choice A" and "Choice B" cards for looking at options. The other cards cover "Now", the four seasons, "Today", "This week", "This month" and four cards each for the Next or Past years, months, weeks and days with a fill-in-the-blank space to indicate a number. (If there's any indication in the book as to whether a dry-erase marker will work on the cards, I don't see it.)
The companion book shows different spreads created by the author and other tarot luminaries who have tried out the system, goes into more depth on each card in the deck and suggests other cards that could be used with a given card, gives sample fictional readings and has an appendix of a nice cross-section of recommended books.
Now to the obvious comparisons between Dynamic Spreads Deck (DSD) and Deck of 1000 Spreads (DKS):
- DKS comes with 65 cards divided into 5 categories while DSD comes with 105 cards divided into 6 sections
- Tarot cards are meant to go beneath the cards in DSD while they're meant to be placed on top of the cards in DKS, resulting in a lot more space being needed for DSD spreads than for DKS spreads
- DSD has no blank cards while DKS does
- DSD doesn't have a specific "Significator" card while DKS does
- Both systems seem to cover the same general ideas, but with different words:
- "Negative Influences" in DKS could be the same as ""who or what is making this more difficult than it should be?" or "My worst habit" in DSD
- "Health" in DKS could be the same as "My body" in DSD
- "Lesson" in DKS could be the same as "What should I learn from this?" in DSD
- "Partner" in DKS could be the same as "Someone else:_____" or "Non-romantic partnerships" in DSD
- Each system has some cards that other is missing:
- DKS has "Timing" cards for "What to leave in the past", "Past life", "Future life", "What to let go of in the future", "What to use in the future", and "What to take from the past" that don't seem to have corresponding cards in DSD
- DSD has an entire section of cards (22, 19 of which have 2 topics on them) that looks at group interactions while DKS has maybe three cards that could be considered to look at the same interactions
I don't think either system is perfect, nor do I think one is better than the other. In an ideal world, one would pick and choose the best cards from each system to produce spreads than can't be produced with either system alone.
Rodney