I think it was firemaiden who once jested that if your cards all come up reversed, maybe you're holding the deck upside down.
Seriously, it might be too soon for you to start using reversals. Then again, maybe not. I think learning reversals is a valid learning process even for readers who wind up not using them. The main reason is, they get you to look at the cards from another angle. That's really all there is to them -- another perspective.
It's like letting the cards play devil's advocate now and then and show you what's out of balance, not quite there, or still needs work.
The mistake that seems most common with reversals is a black and white approach. The reader sees cards as negative or positive with no allowance for a card being both, or for the gray area that we know exists in life. I think that as soon as you begin letting yourself see the many shades of gray that can exist in a reading, you'll 1) begin to read with reversals with greater understanding, and 2) eventually realize that you don't have to see the card reversed in order to have that expanded view. At that point, you don't really need to think about reversals anymore.
By the way, two books that I found invaluable in understanding the full spectrum of reversals were Gail Fairfield's
Choice Centered Tarot and Mary K. Greer's
The Complete Book of Tarot Reversals.
Gail Fairfield's approach is to consider upright cards being about external events, forces or influences, and reversed about what's going on inside the querent. In that case, there's really no negative meaning to reversals, any more than with uprights.
Nevada