Macavity
Doncha just hate it when you buy a book and later read the Amazon "reviews" and they are... awful. Such is perhaps the case with Sallie Nichols': "Jung and Tarot - An Archetypal Journey". Yet it's not THAT bad? (Is it?!) I'd even dare to venture it's rather GOOD? (OTOH, I know little of Jung! ) Anyway, Jim Revak gives it a rather better rating on his Website? Sure, she has odd ideas of Tarot history (and even of Tarot) but then THAT stuff is mostly over with in the first chapter! Anyway it goes through card symbolism in some detail (although admittedly only major Arcana) She may get a little obscure at times (no worse than Aeclectic?) BUT perhaps it's main merit is that it is based on (and pictures) a Marseille Deck... And THAT makes a change!
Anyway, I derived some useful and NEW ideas on major arcana symbolism <shrug> Worth checking out, if you can read a bit, while your next in the bookstore? Anyone else have any VIEWS on this particular book? Just wondering! No Gauntlets thrown down - You may indeed disagree!
Macavity
Anyway, I derived some useful and NEW ideas on major arcana symbolism <shrug> Worth checking out, if you can read a bit, while your next in the bookstore? Anyone else have any VIEWS on this particular book? Just wondering! No Gauntlets thrown down - You may indeed disagree!
Macavity