Le Fanu
I have found myself asking this question of late...
For so long, U.S Games uber-glossy lamination has been the bug-bear of many members, including me, but Im now beginning to question this. Has the time come for us to accept it and see the virtues?
I ask this as Ive noticed that I actually love some of my ultra-laminated decks. Think about it; the glossy Morgan Greer looks great, the colours are richer, the cardstock is eternal, it feels sturdy in the palm of your hand in a way that the "printed in Belgium" editions don't. I also have and love the Russian Tarot of St Petersburg and honestly think that the lamination - reminiscent of the lacquered boxes the artwork imitates - is perfect for the deck. I passed over a chance to buy a "printed in Belgium" edition for this reason.
This week, I received the ("printed in Italy") Albino-Waite and love it regardless. I put an ad in trading as Im curious about what the "Made in Belgium" version is like in comparison. Yet I like the sense that the deck isn't biodegradable. And that I can use it. My partner came back from a business trip in Barcelona today and he had bought me (hurrah!) the Giant Rider Waite. It is "Printed in Italy" and I love it.
OK, downside;
The toxic chemical smell (with use and incense, the smell goes.)
Sometimes the "printed in Italy" editions show a marked deterioration in the actual clarity of image.
The incongruity of "historic decks" and industrial lamination; not a good combination. Id hate to see the Vieville given the lacquering treatment. But then, isn't the Albino-Waite a historic deck now? It has "facsimilie" written on the box and that is how I regard it. A facsimilie /copy of a "historic" deck and one I can use. It isn't the original 60s version and isn't trying to be.
And another thing, comparing the two cardstocks, Ive noticed the "printed in Belgium" ones are on thinner card which can sometimes (as happened to my Hudes and has happened to my Connolly) "bend" slightly in unison. The "printed in Italy" cards never bend. They feel nicely heavy. Im one who likes my cardstock thick and my do they feel thick...
I might be beginning to like it. I was in a shop at Christmas which had the US Games Art Nouveau Tarot which was open for perusal. I had a look at the cards and they were all stuck together (now that was nasty; obviously I didn't buy it) . Ive never had that before and I didn't like it, but all the ones Ive had have ended up being well-loved, well-used decks.
My question; do you avoid the "Printed in Italy" decks? How many do you have? Do you wish you didn't have any? Is it time for us to love them? Should I still be trying to avoid them like the plague? Will we be looking back 10 years hence thinking "ooo remember those exquisitely lacquered decks from the past. Now they're made in China, it's all gone downhill. None of that luxurious finish"...
For so long, U.S Games uber-glossy lamination has been the bug-bear of many members, including me, but Im now beginning to question this. Has the time come for us to accept it and see the virtues?
I ask this as Ive noticed that I actually love some of my ultra-laminated decks. Think about it; the glossy Morgan Greer looks great, the colours are richer, the cardstock is eternal, it feels sturdy in the palm of your hand in a way that the "printed in Belgium" editions don't. I also have and love the Russian Tarot of St Petersburg and honestly think that the lamination - reminiscent of the lacquered boxes the artwork imitates - is perfect for the deck. I passed over a chance to buy a "printed in Belgium" edition for this reason.
This week, I received the ("printed in Italy") Albino-Waite and love it regardless. I put an ad in trading as Im curious about what the "Made in Belgium" version is like in comparison. Yet I like the sense that the deck isn't biodegradable. And that I can use it. My partner came back from a business trip in Barcelona today and he had bought me (hurrah!) the Giant Rider Waite. It is "Printed in Italy" and I love it.
OK, downside;
The toxic chemical smell (with use and incense, the smell goes.)
Sometimes the "printed in Italy" editions show a marked deterioration in the actual clarity of image.
The incongruity of "historic decks" and industrial lamination; not a good combination. Id hate to see the Vieville given the lacquering treatment. But then, isn't the Albino-Waite a historic deck now? It has "facsimilie" written on the box and that is how I regard it. A facsimilie /copy of a "historic" deck and one I can use. It isn't the original 60s version and isn't trying to be.
And another thing, comparing the two cardstocks, Ive noticed the "printed in Belgium" ones are on thinner card which can sometimes (as happened to my Hudes and has happened to my Connolly) "bend" slightly in unison. The "printed in Italy" cards never bend. They feel nicely heavy. Im one who likes my cardstock thick and my do they feel thick...
I might be beginning to like it. I was in a shop at Christmas which had the US Games Art Nouveau Tarot which was open for perusal. I had a look at the cards and they were all stuck together (now that was nasty; obviously I didn't buy it) . Ive never had that before and I didn't like it, but all the ones Ive had have ended up being well-loved, well-used decks.
My question; do you avoid the "Printed in Italy" decks? How many do you have? Do you wish you didn't have any? Is it time for us to love them? Should I still be trying to avoid them like the plague? Will we be looking back 10 years hence thinking "ooo remember those exquisitely lacquered decks from the past. Now they're made in China, it's all gone downhill. None of that luxurious finish"...