|
|
Citizen
Join Date: 14 Nov 2006
Location: Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea
Posts: 7,195
|
Quote:
![]() Now that i know what is it called, i did a bit of googling: http://www.worldlingo.com/ma/enwiki/en/Codpiece/1 At first, the codpiece was entirely a practical matter of modesty. Men's hose (leg coverings) were typically very snug on the legs and open at the crotch, with the genitalia simply hanging loose under the doublet. As changing fashions led to shorter doublets, the codpiece was created to cover the crotch. Alternative theories of the origin of the codpiece exist.[1] for example (from http://www.r3.org/life/articles/codpiece.html) Legend has it that Edward III, king of England from 1327-1377, had the codpiece of his armor enlarged to astounding proportions because he had heard that strength and military prowess were correlated with a man's endowment. As he was in the midst of the Hundred Years' War with the French at the time, it would not be surprising that he would try to seek any possible advantage available to him. He then ordered that the nobility and knights do the same to their armor. The legend goes on to say that the gullible French (from the nobility all the way down to the peasantry) were scared to death by the advance of the "well-equipped" men... Virility, or at least the projection of that image, was important to monarchs during the early Renaissance, both in portraying an aura of strength to enemies and in presenting an image to the people that the succession would not be a problem. also ![]() Henry VIII, like many men of his time, was afflicted with syphilis, and according to a Cambridge, Massachusetts anthropologist, Grace W. Vicary, the exaggerated codpeices contained medication for the relief from the symptoms. They enclosed a specialized bandage and protected outer clothing from being stained by the medicine.(10) Considering the widespread occurrence of venereal diseases during the Renaissance, the greatly enlarged codpiece as a huge protective device is not too far-fetched. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #121 |
|
Support the Forum
via Google Adsense
|
|
| #ADS |
|
Denizen of the Coalsack Nebula
Join Date: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Central England
Posts: 3,885
|
I knew it was a codpiece, but didn't like to say so. Will it make any difference to the way you eye-rhyme with this card? Bee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #122 |
|
Citizen
Join Date: 10 Feb 2008
Location: Somewhere Spooky
Posts: 13,931
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #123 |
|
Citizen
Join Date: 14 Nov 2006
Location: Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea
Posts: 7,195
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
ETA not to forget that Valets/Pages are the youngsters of the Court so the sexuality i guess would be of bigger importance for them than lets say for a settled and mature King. |
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #124 |
|
Empress of Quirkiness
Join Date: 20 Aug 2008
Location: hanging out in my dragon tree
Posts: 992
|
Everyone I love this "Eye Rhythms" thread. Be at Peace Kathy __________________ ~ for those who have gone before us ~ for those who are with us now ~ for those who will come after us ~ ~ ALL GAVE SOME ~ SOME GAVE ALL ~ Semper Fi ~ FREEDOM IS NOT FREE ~ |
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #125 |
|
Denizen of the Coalsack Nebula
Join Date: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Central England
Posts: 3,885
|
O.K. Having another bash at these eye-rhymes. 2 coins. Page Batons. Page Swords, Thanks to the nice clear pics posted by Herzog, I can now see a rhyme between the 2 Coins & Page Swords. It strikes me that the 2 Coins is laid-back, an easy comfortable give-and-take attitude. Whereas the Page Swords seems to have a 'black-and-white' demeanor. Quite a masculine stance - so maybe the codpiece does enhance this page. The fellow in the middle who is so noticably Vertical, looks as though he's a delibrate dividing line between the two. No idea what this might convey in a reading though. Bee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #126 |
|
Citizen
Join Date: 13 Dec 2009
Location: New York USA
Posts: 1,801
|
I got that same feeling of the Wand forming a kind of line. Maybe a line that should not be crossed. The one with the sword seems to scratch his head while planning a way around it. Should we assume that the two coins are symbolic of their relationship? or maybe what's at stake in their relationship? If the two coins describes the situation, what can be said of it? I can't help reducing things down to their simplest state: Two Coins... Two people. We can see the coins are entwined, engaged, They are close. They may not be active, but they seem to rely on each other, or some such thing. Weapons... Conflict.. two people at odds. In the real world one might assume a blunt club is no competition for a long sharp sword. This fight seems uneven. But maybe the club can trip the swordsman, or bop him in the head with a good swing. Who knows... but chances are these two are evenly matched and will duke it out in their own special way. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #127 |
|
Denizen of the Coalsack Nebula
Join Date: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Central England
Posts: 3,885
|
Quote:
Bee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #128 |
|
Citizen
Join Date: 13 Dec 2009
Location: New York USA
Posts: 1,801
|
Quote:
Do you think the two coins might be another group or entity? or a symbolic representation of these two people... If the coins are literal, this could simply mean friends fighting over money... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #129 |
|
Denizen of the Coalsack Nebula
Join Date: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Central England
Posts: 3,885
|
Quote:
.Lordy, there must be tons of ways to interpret these cards. Bee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask a Professional Tarot Reader Top #130 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|