Azarial said:
Do you feel that you can get enough information to answer a question using a one card reading as opposed to a full spread?
I've been studying tarot for a year, and I have learned using a majors-only deck (so no Celtic Crosses for me just yet).
While on occasion, small spreads (5-7 cards) have provided some very powerful readings, I always come back to my ol' reliable: 3-cards with the shadow card.
Sometimes, I'll draw all three cards and explore the reading, but it's clear that had I simply drawn the first card alone, the answer may well have been there. 1-card readings work well for me, and sometimes they seem a lot more "to the point."
I think that it's the interplay of cards that helps me read more clearly using three... but once I start drawing more than that to clarify, I can often tell that they aren't required.
Azarial said:
If so, what other methods do you use to get all that you can possibly get from a card besides just the base meaning? Are there any other methods that you use? I thought maybe I would learn more from tarot by just doing basic one card readings for a while to possibly learn more about a card than I have before.
I spend a lot of time just looking around a card, and that provides all the depth and breadth I need. Usually, there's a sort of "stream of consciousness"... lots of words, ideas, or common images that I scribble down as I look at a card which eventually forms a clear picture. Othertimes, especially if a reading is unclear, I'll take my time looking around the card to see more of the story and how it relates to the reader.
I suppose that's a rather intuitive approach - mighht not fit the definition of "method"!