There are few areas related to tarot about which I have pretty strong views, and on this issue, Bonnie and I certainly are at the opposite ends of the spectrum (though on many other aspects, this is not the case).
If anyone decides to check themselves against any checklist and use that as a boost of self-confidence, fine. This is not, however, where certification usually leads, nor where the self-styled boards aim to have their certification stop.
There is a presumption that someone who is certified will somehow make a better (or 'minimally qualified') reader over someone who has not such certification - this is plain rubbish in terms of reading the cards at hand.
Unfortunately, those who engage in certification do a great dis-service to the broader tarot community, hence why I generally do not simply let these threads go unaddressed. It is not simply about those who may want such amongst themselves, but that the same is also falsely presented to the public as somehow displaying a certifiable proficiency where none is warranted.
At the very least, please also consider reading through the thread '
Tarot Certification Board of America - a critical appraisal', and my entry in for the ATS Newsletter: '
On certification, the codification of ethics, and reading Tarot'.