Le Fanu
Interesting replies...
Mmm...Not sure I buy the Renaissance thing. There were theories and contexts about human form and times have now changed. Bellori (post-Renaissance admittedly) believed that it was the job of the artist to perfect the imperfections and I would argue that it would be wise not to try and create "perfection" or "idealised" bodies. I suppose what we´re talking about here are images that people can relate to.
What I find odd is not the explicit portayal per se, but how misguided it seems.
In comic books, probably the majority of consumers are male so it makes sense.
In male mags, the majority of consumers are male so it makes sense.
But isn´t the target public here a bit different? Yet it surpries me to hear people say "O Im female and hetero and would much rather look at the naked female form". I personally see this as just how conditioned we are by it and the naked male form is just not part of the equation.
For centuries people have been told that beauty = naked female. But interestingly, the 17th Century (and hetero and married) painter Rubens believed that true beauty could only be found in the male form. It´s just a question of what we´re used to. I like Sinduction´s example of Ciro´s Devil card, and I remember at the time there were posts about how many women liked this card. And we don´t even see anything. It´s just a general smouldering, sexual mood.
O and ric, love the Golden Dawn deck, but Im not sure how "present reality" the buttocks of the Star card are.
RiccardoLS said:All people young and beautiful... they are symbols/auratic abstractions of concepts. For instance they are not "a woman fighting a lion", but they are "strength".
Or should they portray/illustrate reality? Then we should have old and young, ugly and beautiful, etc...
And this is just not related to genre. Should people live in an idealized world, in time, like the fake-medieval we all know from the RWS. Or should they live in present reality (or in any other defined time)?
"Nudity" cames as much from a certain comic book approach, but also it cames from classical and renaissance art. I think that on the subject, there is a lot to say. Gender balance is not just in nudity, but in symbols and energies, and many other things.
How does it reflect on reading?
ric
Mmm...Not sure I buy the Renaissance thing. There were theories and contexts about human form and times have now changed. Bellori (post-Renaissance admittedly) believed that it was the job of the artist to perfect the imperfections and I would argue that it would be wise not to try and create "perfection" or "idealised" bodies. I suppose what we´re talking about here are images that people can relate to.
What I find odd is not the explicit portayal per se, but how misguided it seems.
In comic books, probably the majority of consumers are male so it makes sense.
In male mags, the majority of consumers are male so it makes sense.
But isn´t the target public here a bit different? Yet it surpries me to hear people say "O Im female and hetero and would much rather look at the naked female form". I personally see this as just how conditioned we are by it and the naked male form is just not part of the equation.
For centuries people have been told that beauty = naked female. But interestingly, the 17th Century (and hetero and married) painter Rubens believed that true beauty could only be found in the male form. It´s just a question of what we´re used to. I like Sinduction´s example of Ciro´s Devil card, and I remember at the time there were posts about how many women liked this card. And we don´t even see anything. It´s just a general smouldering, sexual mood.
O and ric, love the Golden Dawn deck, but Im not sure how "present reality" the buttocks of the Star card are.