Quote:
Originally Posted by gregory
Does the Fey LOOK like a TdM ?
No. So what is the issue ????
|
Well, it's so well thought of... and um... ::scratches head::
Quote:
Originally Posted by thorhammer
I have felt this wondering, too. I, too, have searched the scans for meaning . . . and am still confused. I see nothing worth having.
|
That's the way I was looking at it, but reading all the raving about how great it is for a first deck (hmmm...) - frankly, I just don't see it at all, at any time... nevermind a beginner. Feels like pandering, ya know?
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJ
I couldn't look at the figures without shuddering, they all look like sorta-survivors of some kind of nuclear holocaust.
Plus so many of the girls seemed sort of sub-teen T&A ... sorry, I just don't see the need and they didn't do a thing for me. 
|

Eeeek. Ouch. Now *that's* de-enabling!
Quote:
Originally Posted by magpie9
I traded for the Fey a while back to see what it was about it that spurred such devotion in it's proponents. I couldn't figure it out. It was...cute. I don't do cute.
I don't think you do cute, Sravana....please don't make me wrong! How will we be able to respect you in the morning?
|
No, you're right. I don't do cute. I can't abide the Hanson-Roberts, sold the Whimsical, the Harmonious, and the 22 Acarni Fiabischi (sp??). The only cute deck that I'm hanging on to is the Napo. I just can't get beyond the Chariot's horses' googly-eyes. Oh. and the Magical Forest.

I guess I have a thing for googly-eyes! (My secret's safe here, right??)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FaireMaiden
I don't know how to say this politely... but this is one of the butt-ugliest decks I've ever seen... The art is flat, one-dimensional, and devoid of any symbolical meaning that I can see. Everytime I see these cards, I feel like I've just turned on a Saturday-morning cartoon show. And it's not even GOOD cartoon... This deck is just plain nauseating.
Why do others flock to it? Well, it's for sure not because they have a sophisticated eye. Perhaps it's because their mental-constructs have yet to move beyond the Cartoon Network.
|
Ouch. FM, what do you think of the Sakki-Sakki? I don't get that one, either. (headless people???)
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Is One
I just bought the Fey. What happened is that several of my friends really liked it and one friend had scans of it in her blog. I liked the things SHE saw in it.
I have not even looked at it yet. I bought the Gothic Tarot of the Vampires on the strength of Umbrae's review. The Fey is by one of the same artists. I have yet to use or look at either deck, so I can't say much except that sometimes, when one is aspiring to own half of Gregory's 1400 decks....I aspire to own 750 before I die, one buys decks one might just want for "the collection."
It's a cheaper obsession than antiques or remodeling the house, or recording equipment.
But it is certainly an obsession.
Man, I'm just babbling.
De-enabling on the Fey is easy. It's silly and goofy and only for people who are looking for that.
|
Speaking for myself, I wish I had the $$ that I spent on the over 100 decks that I've owned and sent onward for less than I paid for them. Any obsession gets too expensive, been there done that. (and I still have around 80 decks. Go figure)
Okay, group - chalk me up as another successful de-enabling!!

Let's hear it for the $20+ bux that I just saved! Woohoo!