mythos
I finished reading Tracy Porter's Tarot Companion last night. I was determined to read the whole thing because I bought it new and paid good money for it. Unbelievable!
Okay ... so she is trying to cram an immense amount of information into a smallish book. I understand that and did not expect any depth. However, I object to books which present information as fact, when it is just one take on the cards, or their correspondences.
I have to wonder, also, whether anyone bothered to proof read it. Not only were there sentences that made no sense ... and not because we are dealing with profound information .... but because they had additional words in them that were pure error.
Another error was the diagram of the tree of life ... yesod and malkuth were reversed. No ... she was not presenting an alternative view of the ToF. She made correspondences to just about everything that crawls ... I could go on, but I won't. I might get nasty. Grrrrrr! (Nastier!) It was a real teeth-grinder! And I can't, in all good conscience, sell it on. I don't want to be responsible for speading the mess.
I figure that it was written with good intentions in mind ... but the road to hell .... and all that!
Okay ... being a bit harsh and nit-picky, but as I read it ... with all its un-proofed errors, and its lack of acknowledgement that it was written from the author's perspective only ... (and she is of course, entitled to write from that perspective ... I believe though, that this should be acknowledged), I thought of all those people out there who are new to tarot ... who are looking for THE answers, and believe that they have discovered them in a single book. It's a worry.
As an idea ... it's great ... as a reality, it leaves way too much to be desired, which is a pity.
Anyone else have any comments on it?
mythos
Okay ... so she is trying to cram an immense amount of information into a smallish book. I understand that and did not expect any depth. However, I object to books which present information as fact, when it is just one take on the cards, or their correspondences.
I have to wonder, also, whether anyone bothered to proof read it. Not only were there sentences that made no sense ... and not because we are dealing with profound information .... but because they had additional words in them that were pure error.
Another error was the diagram of the tree of life ... yesod and malkuth were reversed. No ... she was not presenting an alternative view of the ToF. She made correspondences to just about everything that crawls ... I could go on, but I won't. I might get nasty. Grrrrrr! (Nastier!) It was a real teeth-grinder! And I can't, in all good conscience, sell it on. I don't want to be responsible for speading the mess.
I figure that it was written with good intentions in mind ... but the road to hell .... and all that!
Okay ... being a bit harsh and nit-picky, but as I read it ... with all its un-proofed errors, and its lack of acknowledgement that it was written from the author's perspective only ... (and she is of course, entitled to write from that perspective ... I believe though, that this should be acknowledged), I thought of all those people out there who are new to tarot ... who are looking for THE answers, and believe that they have discovered them in a single book. It's a worry.
As an idea ... it's great ... as a reality, it leaves way too much to be desired, which is a pity.
Anyone else have any comments on it?
mythos