Debra
Yes. I was just trying to understand what the poster was trying to say
Padma explained it.
Yes. I was just trying to understand what the poster was trying to say
Agree, Reall! No borders would be awesome! That was one of my beefs with the Ring Cycle tarot - the borders ate the image, way too big! (and two tone - ugh!)
That is an interesting concept, about famous works being so powerful that it interferes with reading...perhaps due to the fact it already has a life of its own.
I'm reminded of Buryn's Blake Tarot which maybe tries to hard to impose a tarot-like structure on Blake's images. It might be a better idea to let the art grow into an oracle, the way Freder did here. ...
I vote for option with blank white space around the art and small part with title!^^
Apparently the current border design was created to help the illusion of uniformity in the ratios of the artwork (width and length) which varies. I can see that with blank borders, you could easily spot this, while with strong top and bottom ornaments, the eyes are fooled into thinking they are all of the same ratios.
I would love to have a giant version of this deck [emoji16] Like, 6 inches [emoji12]