Clay
I don't know if anyone else has already posted a similar suggestion, but I thought others might be interested in this excellent way to avoid wishful thinking when interpreting a reading for yourself. The method I'm suggesting can get a little time-consuming when used for large spreads, but it's fast enough for smaller spreads of, say, three to five or six cards.
I first purposely choose the cards that I would really like to see come up in each position. If there's a position I'm not sure about, I might pick two or three cards as "acceptable" alternatives. Then I often even "read" the layout with the chosen cards and write down what I'd like the reading to say. Afterwards, I put all the cards back in the deck and do the layout and reading in the usual way. If a card I "wished for" actually comes up in the layout in the same position I had put it in, I consider that very significant. This almost never happens, but I find that having done the "wished for" reading first, I am able to be much more objective when reading the "real" layout.
Clay
I first purposely choose the cards that I would really like to see come up in each position. If there's a position I'm not sure about, I might pick two or three cards as "acceptable" alternatives. Then I often even "read" the layout with the chosen cards and write down what I'd like the reading to say. Afterwards, I put all the cards back in the deck and do the layout and reading in the usual way. If a card I "wished for" actually comes up in the layout in the same position I had put it in, I consider that very significant. This almost never happens, but I find that having done the "wished for" reading first, I am able to be much more objective when reading the "real" layout.
Clay