The "Document 1" Painter

catboxer

There's a lot to look at at Trionfi/.01/e, and I'm sifting through it kind of slowly.

Document number one, the February, 1442 payment authorization, disburses, I think, 20 lire to a painter "Jacomo" (called something else), for making four sets of cards, each containing four suits and "the figures." We can assume the figures to be trump designs.

I believe that painter was probably Jacopo Bellini of Venice, and that "Jacomo" is a misspelling, since that name is usually spelled Giacomo. Jacopo was a well-known early Renaissance figure, and the father of the more-famous Gentile Bellini. He was active in Venice starting in about 1424.

The Renaissance painters were sort of like today's movie stars and rock stars. In 1441, Jacopo Bellini travelled from Venice to Ferrara where he engaged in a contest against a local rock star, Pisanello. He won, and the noteriety he gained from such an event certainly would have attracted the attention of the local rulers.

Jacopo was a competent, if not a great painter. His portrait paintings look like typical late Gothic work, but his drawings and sketches are more interesting. In them, he is more concerned with solving technical problems such as linear perspective, than with rendering authentic human figures. These are the kinds of concerns that dominated the minds of artists of the time. If he was the author of the d'Este cards, his work for them would have been mature and fully realized.

You can see his stuff on Olga's site: http://www.abcgallery.com/B/bellini/jacoppo.html
She mentions that his drawings collections and sketchbooks can be seen at the Louvre. They might shed some light on the contents of these card decks, which I assume are now vanished without a trace.
 

Huck

Sorry,

the text says "Maistro Iacomo depentore dito Sagramoro" and this Sagramoro is in the account-books of Ferrara the most mentioned artist, he's probably not a great artist, but used for a lot of the minor works, under them much heraldric, cause they loved to paint the shields and other marks on all what they did possess. Just a solid worker of art, not more. In his later life he got a little more acceptance. But he's the great Tarocchi painter in Ferrara till 1456.

Bellini is also mentioned in the books. He is not identical with Sagramoro. Great doubts at this don't seem possible.
 

Ross G Caldwell

Huck is right, Iacomo Sagramoro is a different from Iacobo Bellini.

Iacobo Bellini is mentioned only once in Franceschini "Artisti a Ferrara in età umanistica e rinascimentale", n. 461v (p. 209), August 26, 1441, recording a payment of two measures of grain (modios duos frumenti).

"Mandato Illustris domini nostri domini Nicolai marchionis Estensis etc., vos factores generales dare in donum faciatis Iacobo Bellino pictori de Venetiis modios duos frumenti domini, conducendos per eum Venetias.
Ludovicus Casella scripsit
XXVI augusti 1441

in margine: Iacobi Bellini pictoris. Habuit mandatum

(By the command of the Illustrious Lord our Lord Niccolo Marquis of Este etc., may you the household managers (general factors) give as gift to Giacomo Bellini, painter of Venice, two measures of the grain of the Lord, enough to take him to Venice.)

Ludovicus Casella recorded it 26 August 1441.

in margin: Iacobi Bellini pictoris. He got what was mandated.)

Pisanello is mentioned in the same set of entries - as Dave points out.

Ross
 

Cerulean

Pisanello

http://www.kfki.hu/~arthp/bio/p/pisanell/biograph.html


Pisanello was a favored medallist and portrait painter of Leonello D'Este. If you click on the associated links in the Pisanello bio, you will see his bronzes and his portraits. The one of Leonello is supposed to be accurate. Some historians speculate whether painting of one the D'Este princesses were one of the wives or one of the younger step-sisters (father Niccolo had about 30 children accounted for, including the four famous elder sons Ugo, Leonello, Borso and Ercole).