Weather Astrology requires the right charts
Deszroo wrote . . . "As I look at the t-square....mars and mercury capture more of my attention in that both are good contenders for dryness and heat vs air and water situation. Mercury, Mars, Aquarius...I thought of mechanical breakdowns and mishaps...perhaps even caused by water...too little or too much. Although Nep is water...Aquarius is also air (and supposed to be "astral" fluid pouring out of the bearer jug. Following some reports on Kartina.. yes lots of water...."
This is precisely why charts that have a location and a time are needed for analysis. Specifically you need to have the right type of time/place chart. The system that I referred to, and use, recognizes that weather is comprised of warmth/cold, wind and moisture content -- and that this is modified by the topigraphical features of the area in question. This concept and process makes sense. It also requires a deeper level of astrological practice. Any of these special areas do, just as any investigation of development after birth and event definition or prediction, etc.
You can't tell much from a couple of planets involved in an aspect pattern. In the weather charts I noted, planets on/near the IC have the most impact on the analysis, planets on/near the ASC have some impact and planets aspecting the key-focus planet (Sun, Mercury or Moon for warmth, wind or moisture) has a lesser amount of influence. These are very specific approaches to understanding and assessing a chart and it is this type of rigorous approach that is needed. Anything less is a large waste of time.
This is why I always remind those relatively new to astrology to not focus on natal charts alone but to explore other types of charts and applications once they have the basics of natal astrology down. Dave