Pros and Cons Thread Enabling+De-enabling

magpie9

I find I like this review of the St Croix. At the end they show a the cards as a bonus. It's the video review. The written review I don't agree with. As I spend more time with the deck I am seeing ways around the political correctness etc that has been putting me off. In the book, it's best to ignore her "meanings". Here's the link.
http://www.aeclectic.net/tarot/cards/tarot-de-st-croix/review.shtml
 

BodhiSeed

I find I like this review of the St Croix. At the end they show a the cards as a bonus. It's the video review. The written review I don't agree with. As I spend more time with the deck I am seeing ways around the political correctness etc that has been putting me off. In the book, it's best to ignore her "meanings". Here's the link.
http://www.aeclectic.net/tarot/cards/tarot-de-st-croix/review.shtml
After watching the video, I am leaning toward getting this deck. The art is beautiful, and as you said Magpie, I can use what is useful in the booklet and ignore the rest. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this one!
 

magpie9

;) Glad to be of help. It's got a lot going for it.
 

Tanjamuse

Should I buy The Psychic Tarot for the Heart Oracle Deck, by John Holland?
 

magpie9

Personally, I like it..but it's not really Tarot. I don't think I could rad it without the book.
 

Corvinesque

Robert Place Vampires

What say you of Robert Place's Vampire Tarot? I saw it for $10 at the local used bookstore today, but didn't go for it... I'm not that big into vampires, and I already have Vargo's Gothic Tarot, which I don't use or love that much... but from the images I've seen, it looks somehow compelling... do I need it? I feel it calling to me... :bugeyed:
 

Winterchild

The book is worth that much... but if you are not into Dracula or vampires then maybe not... but it is a very good book, he is an excellent writer.
 

Aeric

Robert's Vampire is one of if not the most historically thorough vampire deck. It goes into not only how Stoker's novel fits the Tarot structure, but also touches on real life figures who were influenced by the vampire mythos. His book covers everything from the earliest recounts of bloodsucking creatures in mythology right up to popular depictions in Buffy/Angel in present day (and probably would have included Twilight and Vampire Diaries had it been made today). He also shows in the deck how the differences in the novel and in the popular Francis Ford Coppola movie influenced popular thought. I've never hesitated to read Robert's books. As far as themed decks his companion books are among the best I've ever read on many of their subjects and Vampire is no exception.

I believe Robert disliked this deck out of all of his because he had the least creative control over it with St. Martins Press dictating a lot of parameters. It's the only one he made with them before he returned to his own Hermes publishing company with the Alchemical Renewed and Sevenfold Mystery. I'm not sure what caused this particular deck of his to be the least successful; perhaps since vampires were popular they printed many copies of this deck expecting it to sell well but it didn't. But don't let that detract you from getting it; it's really a gem among vampire decks for the sheer volume of information.

The drawbacks are strictly physical. The cards are larger than the usual RWS and larger than Robert's usual decks at 3.5 x 5.28 inches making them difficult to shuffle. The corners aren't rounded, making them jab your hands when handling (appropriate, I suppose, for vampires!). It's quite an unwieldy deck and I find I'm better off just cutting the deck and pulling top cards then replacing them at random, rather than shuffling.
 

Corvinesque

re: Robert Place Vampire

The book is worth that much... but if you are not into Dracula or vampires then maybe not... but it is a very good book, he is an excellent writer.

I'm a sucker for a great companion book... it's something that makes me really love certain theme decks.

Thank you, Winterchild
 

Corvinesque

re: Robert Place Vampire

Robert's Vampire is one of if not the most historically thorough vampire deck. It goes into not only how Stoker's novel fits the Tarot structure, but also touches on real life figures who were influenced by the vampire mythos. His book covers everything from the earliest recounts of bloodsucking creatures in mythology right up to popular depictions in Buffy/Angel in present day (and probably would have included Twilight and Vampire Diaries had it been made today). He also shows in the deck how the differences in the novel and in the popular Francis Ford Coppola movie influenced popular thought. I've never hesitated to read Robert's books. As far as themed decks his companion books are among the best I've ever read on many of their subjects and Vampire is no exception.

I believe Robert disliked this deck out of all of his because he had the least creative control over it with St. Martins Press dictating a lot of parameters. It's the only one he made with them before he returned to his own Hermes publishing company with the Alchemical Renewed and Sevenfold Mystery. I'm not sure what caused this particular deck of his to be the least successful; perhaps since vampires were popular they printed many copies of this deck expecting it to sell well but it didn't. But don't let that detract you from getting it; it's really a gem among vampire decks for the sheer volume of information.

The drawbacks are strictly physical. The cards are larger than the usual RWS and larger than Robert's usual decks at 3.5 x 5.28 inches making them difficult to shuffle. The corners aren't rounded, making them jab your hands when handling (appropriate, I suppose, for vampires!). It's quite an unwieldy deck and I find I'm better off just cutting the deck and pulling top cards then replacing them at random, rather than shuffling.

Thank you for this, Aeric. It sounds like I need to go back and get this deck, if only for the book itself. I do have a corner rounder, so if necessary, I can use it.