Aeclectic Tarot
Tarot Decks Talk Tarot Learn Tarot Tarot Readings Tarot Books
 Home · Intro to Aeclectic · Forum Library · Aeclectic Tarot Forum Community · Subscribe · Support

Cataloging Urge, Calling All Collectors!

Thread originally posted on the Aeclectic Tarot Forum on 11 Dec 2004, and now archived in the Forum Library.

Gardener  11 Dec 2004 
Hello All,

I don't know if you've noticed, but there seems to be a bit of discussion going on about decks with illustrated pips and the other kind (Marseilles). Reading over the various opinions, I realized that many of my favorite decks are neither Marseilles nor do they feature illustrated pips. I love the modern decks that have some form of abstract art for the minors.

Won't you pretty please help me list these decks? I'm looking for the modern ones, 20th and 21st century.

The minors each show the appropriate number of cups, wands, what have you.

OR

The minors have abstract art. 


Gardener  11 Dec 2004 
THE CATALOG as of December 15

Minors show the appropriate number of the suit symbol

20th Century Tarot
9th Demension Tarot
Amerigo Folchi
Ananda Tarot
Art of Tarot deck
Astral Tarot
Basic Tarot
Beginner's Tarot
Buddha Tarot – Place
Cagliostro
Celtic (Davis)
Crystal Tarot
Dames de Coeur Tarot
De la Rea
Dolphin Daze
Dreampower Tarot
Egyptian Tarot (Lo Scarabeo)
Folchi's Mondo Nuevo
Gareth Knight Tarot
Golden Age of Tarot
Golden Dawn (Cicero)
Golden Dawn (Wang)
Haindl Tarot
Ibis Tarot
Jungian Tarot
Knapp-Hall
La Corte dei Tarocchi
Linol Tarot
Louttre B Tarot
Lover’s Tarot (Lyle)
Maxwell Miller's Universal Tarot
Merlin Tarot
Millennium Tarot/Dorothy Krause
Mystic Tarot (Mystic Meg)
Old English
Oreste Zevola
Oswald Wirth
Parrott
Prediction Tarot
Sacred Circle
Sara Tarot
Servants of the Light
Simplified Tarot
Tarocchi dei Colori
Tarot du Roy Nissanka
Tarot Maddonni
Tarot of Ceremonial Magick
Tarot of Lasenic
Tarot of the Angels – Place
Tarot of the Dead
Tarot of the Saints – Place
Tarot of the Sephiroth
Tarot of the Witches
Tarroco delle vetrate
Tavaglioni's Stairs of Gold
Terrestrial Tarot (U.S. Games)
Thoth
Titania's Star Tarot
Ukiyoe Tarot (U.S. Games)
Urania Verlag
Via Tarot


Abstract Minors

Margarete Petersen
Tarot of the Spirit
Voyager Tarot 


Nina*  11 Dec 2004 
Maybe Gill... they remind in some ways of Thoth.. 


Rusty Neon  11 Dec 2004 
abstract art / appropriate number of suit implements

Tarot of the Spirit Tarot

_____________________

appropriate number of suit implements

Gareth Knight Tarot
Egyptian Tarot (Lo Scarabeo)
Terrestrial Tarot (U.S. Games)
Ukiyoe Tarot (U.S. Games)
Via Tarot
Tarot of the Sephiroth
Servants of the Light 


Gerbear  11 Dec 2004 
Appropiate number of suit implements;

Golden Age of Tarot
Oreste Zevola
Linol Tarot
Louttre B Tarot
Tarocchi dei Colori
Dames de Coeur Tarot
Millennium Tarot/Dorothy Krause
Sara Tarot 


contrascarpe  11 Dec 2004 
Tsk, tsk ..... Gardener missed some in our combined collection ......

Amerigo Folchi
Basic Tarot
Buddha
Tarot of Ceremonial Magick
Tarot of the Dead
Parrott
Tarot of the Saints

The two Robert Place decks (Buddha and Saints) could be considered marginally applicable here. The Ceremonial Magick and Parrott are Thoth-based, as is the Via which I was going to add until I saw Rusty Neon beat me to it.

Oh, and Tarot of the Transition which I just presented as a gift to SongDeva.

Dan 


Cerulean  11 Dec 2004 
English
Lovers Tarot (Jane Lyle) - 1993 (22); 2003 10th Anniversary (78) (St. Martin's Press?)

German
Urania Verlag, 1990-2004

American/U.S
Knapp-Hall Tarot - circa 1920
B.O.T.A, various dates from 1950(?) -2004 - Color Your Own

U.S. Games editions, marketed in U.S./Europe, pre 1990

French
Grimaud
Fournier

Italian
Several Lo Scarabeo decks pre 1995, Italian editions

Several Di Vecchi, Italian editions

Japanese (with Chinese editions as well)
Several Japanese decks

P.S. I"ll add to the list as I remember them or list... 


Lee  11 Dec 2004 
Appropriate number of suit symbol:

Prediction Tarot
Mystic Tarot (Mystic Meg)
Art of Tarot deck
Titania's Star Tarot
Beginner's Tarot
Jungian Tarot
Golden Dawn (Wang)
Golden Dawn (Cicero)
Merlin Tarot
Dreampower Tarot
Oswald Wirth Tarot (US Games edition)
Tarot of the Witches
Ibis Tarot
Tarot Maddonni
La Corte dei Tarocchi
Angels Tarot (Place)

-- Lee 


Bean Feasa  15 Dec 2004 
Sacred Circle :) 


Jewel-ry  15 Dec 2004 
Hi there Gardener,

I realised a little while ago that these were my favourite decks too! :)
I have many of those already mentioned but also:

Angels - Place
Cagliostro
Tarot du Roy Nissanka
I Tarocchi classici
Tarocco Soprafino
Tarocco Italiano

Interesting topic!




baba-prague  15 Dec 2004 
Yes, very interesting topic. Not sure I can add much to the impressive lists above, but there is one:

Tarot de Lasenic (1938) 


Gardener  15 Dec 2004 
Okay, I have updated the list for modern non-scenic minors. Thank you all!

Edited to add: Cerulean, sorry I didn't add the ones you mentioned, I wasn't sure how to list them. Do you have any titles?

Thoughts:
I am amazed that there are not more abstract art minors. Maybe I shouldn't be, but it seems that abstraction would lend itself so well to Tarot. I guess most abstract art goes into Oracle Decks. Of course, then we have to ask, how abstract is abstract. After all, I included the Voyager as abstract even though it is clearly photos of things. Explanation? Because each pip card is not meant to be a scene, but something impressionistic and not easy to define. The profusion of images makes it non-illustrative, to my mind. How many people see a Voyager card and say, there is too much for me to know what I'm looking at?

Shouldn't there be more abstract tarot? 


Gardener  15 Dec 2004 
Here is my thought which sparked this thread in the first place. I am wondering how people read modern non-scenic pips. Do you just apply divinatory meanings from illustrated pip decks? Sometimes I find myself looking at, say, the Crystal Tarot Six of Wands and visualizing the Hanson Roberts Six of Wands.

Or do you use keywords?

Do you use numerology/kabbalah/elemental association?

Do you look at the imagery until ideas come to you?

I am sure that many of us use some combination of the above, but I'm curious if there is one systems that you find yourself reaching for first. I make a conscious effort to work with numerology etc, but find myself more and more supplementing that with ideas from the imagery. 


Gardener  15 Dec 2004 
What do you think of the Roy Nissanka? It's one I have been flirting with for a while and would love to hear if you have used it and/or enjoyed it and/or want to trade it... 


Umbrae  15 Dec 2004 
The wonderful and often overlooked Balbi... 


Myrrha  15 Dec 2004 
Grand Esoterico... the minors for this deck seem to have been the basis for the Crystal Tarot.

--Myrrha 


Moonbow*  15 Dec 2004 
Old English

Tavagione's Stairs of Gold 


April  15 Dec 2004 
Appropriate number of suit symbols:
20th Century Tarot
9th Demension Tarot
Astral Tarot
Simplified Tarot

Apologies if they've already been mentioned. 


Gardener  15 Dec 2004 
Ah, I'm going to have to ALPHEBETIZE this list, aren't I? 


Jewel-ry  15 Dec 2004 
Gardener wrote:
What do you think of the Roy Nissanka? It's one I have been flirting with for a while and would love to hear if you have used it and/or enjoyed it and/or want to trade it...


The Majors and court cards are rich in colour which is a major part of this deck, it adds depth and is at times quite beautiful. The pip cards are exactly that, the correct number of cups. swords etc., for instance the cups are all little (quite english looking) tea cups with lotus flowers for decoration. My imagination makes them fine china! I havn't 'played' with it enough to give an informed opinion but I know that I will, and I feel that when I do it will speak to me. Definately a deck I wont part with.

:) 


Cerulean  15 Dec 2004 
http://www.tarothermit.com/decks.htm

If you want more detail on the Di Gumppenberg variations, there's also a thread...

Probably too much detail. But so far that is what I know, collected together, as I have to wade through various books and decks.

Hope it helps.

http://www.tarotforum.net/showthread.php?t=15670&highlight=di+gumppenberg 


Scion  15 Dec 2004 
What about the Cosmic Tribe? They straddle the line between pips and abstraction, often with vaguely scenic renderings of the suits. 


WolfSpirit  16 Dec 2004 
Minors that show the appropriate number and suit symbol:

Dolphin Daze Deck - self-published by our own dolphingirl. 


Lee  16 Dec 2004 
Gardener wrote:
I am wondering how people read modern non-scenic pips.
I use this method:

http://www.tarotforum.net/showthread.php?t=32084

Here's another appropriate-number-of-suit-symbols deck:

Celtic Tarot (Courtney Davis)

-- Lee :) 


Eco74  16 Dec 2004 
There is also the 'Tarocco delle Vetrate' ('Stained Glass Tarot') and the 'Spanish Tarot', which is very marseilles-esqe but not considered a genuine Marseilles. 


Gardener  19 Dec 2004 
Okay, now we have a reasonably complete (or at least very long) list of modern decks with non-scenic minors. So what? Other than giving us a lovely list of decks to compare our own collections to, it's not much good. But as the attentive reader will have guessed, I'm really more interested in how people read cards that don't show people scenes. Most people can find some sort of personal meaning in images that show people, especially people interacting with animals or other people. Stance, costume, expression, these are clues we've been interpreting all our lives. But abstract designs must (I think) call on a different part of our imagination. What happens when we look at a bunch of curlicues decorating a bunch of goblets? Do we just think of keywords? Probably not.

So I have this idea that we approach different kinds of abstract imagery differently. Bored yet? If not, read on!

I'm going to tackle this question by trying to see if there are categories of abstract imagery. I already started with "suit symbols" versus "really abstract." Now as you know, I've already run into trouble because I put some photo collage decks in the "really abstract" category. But this isn't an art class, it's a question about how our happy little brains play with imagery.

So what further categories? I propose, within the category of decks where minors show the appropriate number of the suit symbol:

Late 19th Century Occult Traditions

Thoth and its descendants

Simple, minimal decoration

Ornate or with complex symbols

Theme/novelty/alternative system grafted on

I know there are also a number of modern reproductions of the earlier woodblock and other renaissance decks, but that's too complicated for me to follow, so I’ll leave that to the historians among us.

I'll wait a day to see if you want to modify my categories, then attempt to sort the decks on the list... 


Rusty Neon  22 Dec 2004 
another one for the list:

Vertigo Tarot 


Jude Buffum  22 Dec 2004 
The Housewives Tarot has the appropriate number of symbols in all of the Minor Arcana. :) 


The Cataloging Urge, Calling All Collectors! thread was originally posted on 11 Dec 2004 in the Tarot Decks board, and is now archived in the Forum Library. Read the active threads in Tarot Decks, or read more archived threads.

Library Index

Tarot Decks
Archives by Month


August 2001
September 2001
October 2001
November 2001
December 2001
January 2002
February 2002
March 2002
April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005


 Home · Intro to Aeclectic · Forum Library · Aeclectic Tarot Forum Community · Subscribe · Support

Aeclectic Tarot  |  Tarot Forum  |  Tarot Cards  |  Learn Tarot  |  Tarot Readings  |  Tarot Books  |  Tarot Links  ||  Advertise  |  Support  |  Email

   Aeclectic Tarot  © 1996 - 2007. Created & maintained by Solandia