jmd
I'm unsure as to what Rosanne is implying above by "I do think what we see in the old has been tampered with". From other comments Rosanne has made, "the old" seems to imply the TdMII (Conver-type) that emerges after the carver of this deck was likely well and truly dead. If the Cary sheet is implied (a wonderful depiction that predates the Noblet by possibly 150 years), then there are of course key differences that also show the direction the Marseille took to stabilise to something very close indeed to the Noblet.
These 'historical' excursions lead us smack into the very centre and cradle of the whole "Marseille" iconography, and as such, and though they are historical explorations indeed, they also transcend the solely historical towards a centred and balanced understanding of not only the Marseille-type, but tarot as a whole.
This possibly goes beyond the specifics of the first card of the Majors, but the Bateleur is, after all, so central to beginning to develop an understanding into this most incredible of extent decks!
These 'historical' excursions lead us smack into the very centre and cradle of the whole "Marseille" iconography, and as such, and though they are historical explorations indeed, they also transcend the solely historical towards a centred and balanced understanding of not only the Marseille-type, but tarot as a whole.
This possibly goes beyond the specifics of the first card of the Majors, but the Bateleur is, after all, so central to beginning to develop an understanding into this most incredible of extent decks!