Paul
Hello all--
Basic question here, which Googling is not yielding that fast food answer we have come to expect from the Internet.
So, I'm going to a proper sit-down restaurant for discussion.
When analyzing an Horary chart, I have a significator of the quesited aspecting the Ascendant, in a trine; not the Planet/Lord of the Ascendant, mind you, but the Ascendant. This aspect is right out of the gate, with no frustrations or prohibitions, etc.
So, my question is, even though the Lord of the Ascendant Planet does not aspect the quesited planet, is it salient enough that the quesited planet aspects the "Ascendant," as in the the point on the chart? That is to say, is it essentially bringing the quesited and querent together?
Thanks in advance.
Paul
Basic question here, which Googling is not yielding that fast food answer we have come to expect from the Internet.
So, I'm going to a proper sit-down restaurant for discussion.
When analyzing an Horary chart, I have a significator of the quesited aspecting the Ascendant, in a trine; not the Planet/Lord of the Ascendant, mind you, but the Ascendant. This aspect is right out of the gate, with no frustrations or prohibitions, etc.
So, my question is, even though the Lord of the Ascendant Planet does not aspect the quesited planet, is it salient enough that the quesited planet aspects the "Ascendant," as in the the point on the chart? That is to say, is it essentially bringing the quesited and querent together?
Thanks in advance.
Paul