Emily
Reading this thread has reminded me of just why I traded this deck on - the colouring is lovely but all that glitters is not gold in this deck - and some of the images were to bizarre even for me to try and read.
Thanks for the link Cerulean. Is that a recent review? I don't remember it being there back when I had the deck. Anyway, after reading your review I'm even more keen to pick up another copy.Cerulean said:it doesn't matter...the image is too horrid. Everyone asks the same question. People don't see this in my review on aeclectic.net before asking. Ah well!
http://www.aeclectic.net/tarot/card...ce/review.shtml
sapienza said:I traded this deck away some time ago...However, of late I've been considering getting another copy as I'm sure it will one day be out of print and then I'll regret letting it go....I'm...keen to pick up another copy.
Amazing how one supremely ugly yet historically symbolic card can destroy 78 cards, including many magnificent ones. I have this deck, so the question comes after this thread (with operation) : to keep or not to keep (the deck,that is). I really like most of the deck, especially the majors and aces.