Marion
(Yes, I just made that phrase up.)
My thoughts only and I would glad to hear all comments and opposing views:
I have been reading the Aeclectic Board for only a few months, but one viewpoint that I see very often is that if any meaning, interpretation, way of reading or working of a symbol seems right to the person, then it IS right, automatically. I find I have been calling this 'tarotic relativism', after the more famous 'moral relativism'.
Surely there needs to be absolutes somewhere in this field, or as Carl Jung said (more or less) you just float from meaning to meaning, symbol to symbol and everything means everything.
As an example, take Christianity. Now the Church has the Bible, plus numerous accepted writings, and accepted interpreations of those writings plus the odd bit of sanctified papal bluster. Now, I assure you, no one ever says, "well yes, we have this material, but you just follow Christianity in any way that seems right to you." It may be interesting, and it may 'feel right', but ladies and gents, it ain't Christianity!
And, I will go on to say to anyone out there who is getting huffy and saying "well, of course not, Christianity is repressive and doesn't let you think and feel" that if you aren't thinking and feeling it isn't the Church's fault!
The law for example is a reference point, within a society anyway. I bet those two boys who murdered James Bulgar thought that it felt just right. Okay, extreme example, but that's what examples are for.
I think Tarot has reference points too, mainly in thw writings of those skilled in the field who have mastered its depths. Their teachings need (in my opinion) to be taken as reference points. For one thing, as an aside, it saves the llesser lights... and I count myself as one... from working everything out from scratch every time.
I guess from this you can see that I am no fan of the 'if it feels right it is right' school of thought. On the other hand, it will be a strange day indeed if I was to put myself forward as a deep thinker in Tarot or anywhere else.
Other thoughts?
My thoughts only and I would glad to hear all comments and opposing views:
I have been reading the Aeclectic Board for only a few months, but one viewpoint that I see very often is that if any meaning, interpretation, way of reading or working of a symbol seems right to the person, then it IS right, automatically. I find I have been calling this 'tarotic relativism', after the more famous 'moral relativism'.
Surely there needs to be absolutes somewhere in this field, or as Carl Jung said (more or less) you just float from meaning to meaning, symbol to symbol and everything means everything.
As an example, take Christianity. Now the Church has the Bible, plus numerous accepted writings, and accepted interpreations of those writings plus the odd bit of sanctified papal bluster. Now, I assure you, no one ever says, "well yes, we have this material, but you just follow Christianity in any way that seems right to you." It may be interesting, and it may 'feel right', but ladies and gents, it ain't Christianity!
And, I will go on to say to anyone out there who is getting huffy and saying "well, of course not, Christianity is repressive and doesn't let you think and feel" that if you aren't thinking and feeling it isn't the Church's fault!
The law for example is a reference point, within a society anyway. I bet those two boys who murdered James Bulgar thought that it felt just right. Okay, extreme example, but that's what examples are for.
I think Tarot has reference points too, mainly in thw writings of those skilled in the field who have mastered its depths. Their teachings need (in my opinion) to be taken as reference points. For one thing, as an aside, it saves the llesser lights... and I count myself as one... from working everything out from scratch every time.
I guess from this you can see that I am no fan of the 'if it feels right it is right' school of thought. On the other hand, it will be a strange day indeed if I was to put myself forward as a deep thinker in Tarot or anywhere else.
Other thoughts?