Maggiemay
I have a really hard time getting a clear '' feel'' about the moon card when I use it in a reading or for meditation purposes....
Here is where I get stuck with this card ( and where I would need your insights!!!) :
You see, the way I interpret the moon card is pretty much as a counter-evolutive movement.... by that I mean that it works against it's essential & God given natural intended purpose.
POINT & CASE: The moon ( satelite) normally exerts its influence upon sea-water which is a living body filled with living organisms....
follow me so far? I hope so...
---BUT---- in the Arcana bearing it's name: the moon, is in fact not exerting any influence. Quite the opposite is true! : Since she is absorbing the dropplets of water that are going up from the man made pool of water below.
I find this card to be a very very introspective, introverted card that plummets to the very depths of the inconscious...
So here is my "problem'' : why does the generic interpretation of this card sometimes say that it has to do with the public & popularity?
The public aspect would be true if we only took into account the astrological interpretation of this luminar. Wouldn't you say?
Thanks for reading me and thanks for your insights.
( ps: Please bear with me as I very embarrassed by my question. I fear that it's a silly question exposing my ignorance of Tarot... BUT hey I am here to learn!!)
Here is where I get stuck with this card ( and where I would need your insights!!!) :
You see, the way I interpret the moon card is pretty much as a counter-evolutive movement.... by that I mean that it works against it's essential & God given natural intended purpose.
POINT & CASE: The moon ( satelite) normally exerts its influence upon sea-water which is a living body filled with living organisms....
follow me so far? I hope so...
---BUT---- in the Arcana bearing it's name: the moon, is in fact not exerting any influence. Quite the opposite is true! : Since she is absorbing the dropplets of water that are going up from the man made pool of water below.
I find this card to be a very very introspective, introverted card that plummets to the very depths of the inconscious...
So here is my "problem'' : why does the generic interpretation of this card sometimes say that it has to do with the public & popularity?
The public aspect would be true if we only took into account the astrological interpretation of this luminar. Wouldn't you say?
Thanks for reading me and thanks for your insights.
( ps: Please bear with me as I very embarrassed by my question. I fear that it's a silly question exposing my ignorance of Tarot... BUT hey I am here to learn!!)